Mythbusters to do Apollo

On Apr 9, 9:38 am, (Joseph Nebus) wrote:
It's a small mention near the end of the article, but the
Onion AV Club has an interview with Jamie Hyneman and Adam Savage
of Mythbusters, and they mention that ``we're inthe middle of doing
the Apollo Moon Landing hoax'':

http://www.avclub.com/content/interv...ie_hyneman_and

I must admit I'm looking forward to seeing how they figure
out how to end the segment with the Moon exploding.

--
Joseph Nebus
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In Mythbusting-101, here's a somewhat better dyslexic encrypted
wording, as offering yet another one of those "don't ask, don't tell"
or need-to-know kind of things about our forbidden moon and of our
crack NASA team of "right stuff".

Notice how the public/unmoderated Usenet groups never seem to pick up
on these good ones, yet they'll allow unlimited posting of those
intentionally key word stuffed topics of smut and porn that'll
discourage most others, on behalf of clownish perpetrating their
ongoing ruse throughout Usenet, so that the general public and of
their news media gets distracted or otherwise turned away from the
chase.

"NASA Sets Sights on Lunar Dust Exploration Mission (LADEE)"
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.s...6d14005?hl=en#

"NASA is preparing to send a small spacecraft to the moon in 2011 to
assess the lunar atmosphere and the nature of dust lofted above the
surface."

"LADEE will gather detailed information about conditions near the
surface and environmental influences on lunar dust. A thorough
understanding of these influences will help researchers understand how
future exploration may shape the lunar environment and how the
environment may affect future explorers."

Gee whiz, as a part of their "Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory
(GRAIL)" mission, you'd have to think LADEE and GRAIL are almost
exactly as though they'd never been there, and to think now they're
getting somewhat antsy about all of that physically dark and crystal
dry moon dust that's tens of fluffy meters deep in places, as well as
unavoidably gamma and X-ray saturated, not to mention double IR hot by
day and otherwise because there's such vacuum is why our moon is
continually venting the likes of smoking hot sodium into that unusual
lunar atmosphere, plus that "nature of dust lofted above the surface"
as having been so physically dark and having been more than a wee bit
electrostatic charged to the level of what several solar wind forced
teraVolts has to offer, and by rights this new and improved science
should therefore become rather interesting.

Of course, I could be wrong, and to think it wouldn't even be the
first time. Too bad we still do not have the objective expertise of
any such fly-by-rocket landers, as well as for our pondering as to why
LUNAR-A couldn't have been deployed as of a decade ago, whereas at
least from that one alone we could have known something about the
moon's unusually low density interior in a very 3D mapping kind of
way, and not that JAXA's LUNAR-A was the only multiple seismic probe
kind of interior penetrating method for accomplishing such a 3D
interior mapping opportunity, as having been quietly terminated and/or
banished by our NASA.
.. - Brad Guth