Secret Pixels of Venus / by Brad Guth

On May 1, 5:29 am, Williamknowsbest wrote:
Some have said that the surface of Venus today is safe for human
habitation. These same individuals say the moon is not. We don't
have to guess about the surface condition of either.

Here's a picture from the surface of Venus
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ima...nera13_big.gif

that was sent by the Soviet Venera 13 space probe sitting on the
surface of Venus after parachuting there on 1 March 1982. The
vehicle, even though safeguarded from conditions in its own safe-like
enclosure survived only half an hour in the blazing 482 C (900 F)
temperature - about twice as hot as your oven at home. The air
pressure was 92 bar - 92 times sea level pressure on Earth. Chemical
analysis of the droplets in the clouds surrounding the lander indicate
they wree pure sulfuric acid.

In other kind and constructive words, there's actually hundreds of
teratonnes worth of easily extractable h2o, especially when taken from
within that relatively cold nighttime clouded season (say at 60+ km).


Now if any of you have ever left a chicken or a steak under a broiler
at 500 F for too long, or if any of you have ever cooked a whole
turkey in minutes in a pressure cooker (which operates at 2 bar) - or
if any of you have ever dropped anything organic in sulfuric acid -
you may have some inkling of just how BAD a day you would have if you
found yourself on the surface of Venus!

Twice as hot as the broiler gets, 40x more pressure than a pressure
cooker, and clouds of liquid sulfuric acid.. hmm..

Any organic material, would burst into a weird sort of flame, and
dissolve away in seconds leaving the bones behind which might last
nearly 20 minutes or so before dissolving altogether.

Sadly, this above statement of yours is simply another good example as
to what more than proves you know so damn little of actual physics or
science. It's as though you are still a smarter than average 5th
grader, with lots to learn, except you're actually too damn old to
learn anything.


This is NOT conducive to life.

As far as the moon is concerned.

We've been there.. Here's a series of films shot from Apollo 15's
Falcon lander.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t1xzPGyt4F4

Here's a few more images from the lunar surface
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e6c60...La6BOFu3A&NR=1

And if you want to see more! for only $20 you can get the DVDhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OjtJ3GTT5ms&feature=related

Euugene Cernan said once that naysayers can spin all sorts of crazy
theories they want about Apollo,to take away the thrill, and the glory
of those missions to the American people, but there's one thing
they'll never do, and that's take those footprints I made on Montes
Taurus the Winter of 1972 away from me!.

Now it is true that there is more radiation on the moon than on Earth,
but the amounts are tolerable if stay times are short - less than 90
days. For those who wish to stay longer than a year on the moon, you
need to get underground or do something different. This is an issue
for long-term habitation. Not for short term exploration or tourism
or even industry if you rotate work crews or work tele-robotically
from shielded bunkers

It is an issue that will be resolved in my estimation.

Your bipolar form of using conditional physics and genetic infused
naysayism is showing its ugly Semitic head once again.

Using your subjective and otherwise conditional laws of conditional
physics in order to discredit what can be otherwise technically
accomplished with such a surplus of local energy and resources to
spare, is only boasting as to further proof-positive and otherwise
nailing down about your BD(bipolar disorder), that's forever going to
continually object to anything on behalf of Venus.

The same laws of physics that makes all things of Mook function
without a hitch and at good profit margin to boot, instead could be
utilized on behalf of making nifty stuff happen on behalf of Venus,
regardless of how hot and nasty that raw environment is to naked life
as we know it.

Your "This is NOT conducive to life" should have been more properly
stated as 'not conducive to naked dumbfounded life'.

Pressure once equalized is a biological no-brainer, and of such dry
temperature isn't hardly an issue with unlimited local energy and
insulation as good as R-1024/m is certainly not hardly a bad thing,
any more so than CO2--co/o2 is the least bit insurmountable. Even
crystal dry S8 is 100% harmless.

Unlike our naked and thus unavoidably anticathode reactive moon,
whereas one bad halo CME or series of cosmic gamma events (of which
there are always many), and within minutes human DNA is sufficiently
done for (aka 'past the point of no return'), whereas on Venus our DNA
is extremely well protected, far better off than here on Earth, as
well as there being no gamma radiating moon adding its lethal energy
trauma plus gravity/tidal force of global warming affect to the
already geothermally forced situation as a toasty surface environment.

Of course, those easily fooled by way of purely subjective evidence,
by mainstream hyped eye-candy of all things inert, especially when any
number of objective forms of evidence has been continually discounted
as though Old Testament taboo/nondisclosure rated, leaves little to
conclude other than brown-nosed birds of a Semitic feather (like
yourself) do in fact flock together.

Your clearly bipolar skewed way of taking each and everything out of
context and then intentionally interpreting on only the utmost
negative aspects, including your persistent exclusion of whatever
intelligent use of technology could muster, is just further proof-
positive of your bipolar intentions of continually doing everything
you possibly can in order to undermine or disqualify each and every
consideration on behalf of polishing anything except Mook stuff.

Yourself, GW Bush and company of brown-nosed minions are clearly one
in the same as Hitler, except combined and while off your bipolar meds
is when you folks are much worse than, as well as having polluted and
exterminated far greater numbers along with your mutually faith-based
perpetrated cold-war(s).

Your intentions are as always every bit as clear as another DARPA S-
Band Chapel Bell transponder.
.. - Brad Guth

On Apr 30, 4:09 am, Williamknowsbest wrote:
On Mar 8, 3:38 am, "Stan Engel" wrote:

You're an asshole."BradGuth" wrote in message

...

--
Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com

“Apparently our Stan Engel is without words, as well as without
physics or science.”

I tend to agree with your assessment about that individual. However,
even though some ill informed folks are fascinated with Venus for the
inconceivably wrong reasons, that shouldn't put us off thinking
creatively about Venus. After all, its still an interesting planet.

True enough, as it's mountainous terrain is looking almost as though
it once had its very own massive moon, and of its crystal dry and thus
safe lower atmosphere is perhaps much like Earth prior to getting iced
down by way of an icy proto-moon and from other icy contributions.


While the surface is waay too hot at present and the atmosphere is
poisonous to life at present, it should be remembered that at an
altitude of 50 km or so, the atmospheric pressure is the same as that
on Earth, and the air temperature is a balmy 70 F - and the CO2
atmosphere is 3 times as dense as that of Earth's nitrogen oxygen
atmosphere.

Life even as we know it can adapt to pressure, even to considerably
less O2 and lots of CO2, not to mention dry S8 isn't even all that
insurmountable unless you haven't the time to adjust/evolve or the
technology in order to artificially create whatever local habitat
environment you'd like.


This inspired the famous astronomer Carl Sagan to speculate that
humans might develop engineered free floating plants that process the
CO2 in the Venusian atmosphere into carbon compounds

In 1967 Buckminster Fuller suggested that geodesic domes 1 mile in
diameter could float in Earth's atmosphere being homes to 50,000
people. It is quite possible with 2.5 kg per cubic meter lifting
capacity, that such floating cities might make an appearance in Venus'
upper atmosphere. Such stations might tend aerial gardens that are
engineered to transform the Venusian landscape into something more
earthlike.

Venusian floating cities is pretty much exactly what my rigid
composite airship represents, whereas robotic airships or as those
configured as fully human sustaining airships is technically doable
within existing technology. Too bad folks that so often claim being
so all-knowing actually do not let on about knowing squat about
accomplishing any R&D on behalf of accomplishing such rigid composite
airships.


I have proposed elsewhere that ICF based nuclear propulsion system
could be used to harvest rich asteroids and bring them into orbit
around Earth. There, teleoperated factories on orbit could process
asteroids into useful products that would then rain down to users on
Earth.

A similar setup can be imagined for Venus. A ring of asteroidal
factories and space colonies could send down engineered plants and
free flying cities. We could call them 'cloud minders'

POOF City at Venus L2 is cool and downright nifty, whereas any amount
of volume and mass isn't the least bit of a problem to interactively
sustain that kind of halo orbit, offering our best depot/gateway for
all sorts of future to/from Venus expeditions.


The atmospheres of Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune have similarly friendly
environments where cloud cities might be built - if a reason could be
found to build them.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Floatin...ation_of_Venus

How about the good old and well enough peer replicated reason being,
there's clearly signs of other intelligent life existing/coexisting on
Venus?
. - Brad Guth

Venus Facts : don't ask, don't tell.

Wow! folks here in this Usenet anti-think-tank are deathly afraid to
even look at Venus.

Must be of something Muslim or Islamic about the planet of Venus that
we're not supposed to look at, or otherwise deductively question.
.. - Brad Guth


On Mar 6, 9:47 am, BradGuth wrote:
Though many official image archives exist, thanks again to our once
upon a time Usenet contributor "tomcat", for having posted the
optional link to this somewhat older but updated collective page of
our Venus surface images.http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/th...humbnails.html

Some of the most interesting of natural as well as AI(artificial
intelligence) worthy information can be found within image No.17 from
the top left, as clearly situated within the 225 m/pixel composite
frame of view by way of such radar imaging obtained pixels that just
so happens to include the robust, rather sizable and somewhat complex
community of structures with 'GUTH Venus', of which by all means you
should apply your very own PhotoShop or Photo whatever resampling/
enlargement of at least 3X, along with using whatever's your best
unsharp-mask filter plus other image cleaning or contrast options
you'd care to apply. Try to remember, that a purely negative or
naysay mindset of a true rusemaster or of faith-based formulated
denial simply can not accomplish such PhotoShop enlargements, at least
not without making this image look far worse off than it really is.

"Lava channels, Lo Shen Valles, Venus from Magellan Cycle 1"http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/html/object_page/mgn_c115s095_1.htmlhttp://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hires/mgn_c115s095_1.gif

First of all, you do not have to be an Einstein or most any other kind
of wizard, just as long as you're not deductive impaired, logic
impaired or faith-based mindset against ETs existing/coexisting upon
other than Earth. Not that Earth isn't entirely extra special and
perhaps far between similar wet and badly polluted worlds capable of
accommodating our forms of complex life as is, as well as in the buff,
so to speak.

Speaking of other worlds; if you still can not manage to zoom in and/
or enlarge sufficiently in order to find this complex community of
interesting pixels on your own, much less properly photo enlarge for a
somewhat better view, then perhaps you are not nearly as good at basic
observationology as you think you are. Remember that the small
details of the Venus terrain are in fact quite visible and of
impressive geology formations as is, and of whatever else is looking
as though intelligent created or as modified to suit are those items
of somewhat larger pixel patterns. So, in all fairness you can't
possibly claim seeing one set of pixels as forming a given pattern
related to whatever is perfectly natural, as clearly being the case,
and then not deductively interpret those of other pixels of them more
substantial patterns that look as though anything but natural, or
perhaps that's just my open mindset and otherwise deductive logic
kicking in.
- Brad Guth -

Interesting, how the planet Venus and of what's so intelligent that's
existing/coexisting on that planet is also officially taboo/off-
limits.

Apparently Usenet has laws against allowing deductive image
interpretation, thus whatever observationology is not going to fly
unless it's over each of their brown-nosed dead bodies.

It's much like being on a NO-FLY list that's intended for nailing or
killing off anything that's the least bit intelligent. Way to go
Google/NOVA Usenet.
.. - Brad Guth


On Mar 6, 9:47 am, BradGuth wrote:
Though many official image archives exist, thanks again to our once
upon a time Usenet contributor "tomcat", for having posted the
optional link to this somewhat older but updated collective page of
our Venus surface images.http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/th...humbnails.html

Some of the most interesting of natural as well as AI(artificial
intelligence) worthy information can be found within image No.17 from
the top left, as clearly situated within the 225 m/pixel composite
frame of view by way of such radar imaging obtained pixels that just
so happens to include the robust, rather sizable and somewhat complex
community of structures with 'GUTH Venus', of which by all means you
should apply your very own PhotoShop or Photo whatever resampling/
enlargement of at least 3X, along with using whatever's your best
unsharp-mask filter plus other image cleaning or contrast options
you'd care to apply. Try to remember, that a purely negative or
naysay mindset of a true rusemaster or of faith-based formulated
denial simply can not accomplish such PhotoShop enlargements, at least
not without making this image look far worse off than it really is.

"Lava channels, Lo Shen Valles, Venus from Magellan Cycle 1"http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/html/object_page/mgn_c115s095_1.htmlhttp://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hires/mgn_c115s095_1.gif

First of all, you do not have to be an Einstein or most any other kind
of wizard, just as long as you're not deductive impaired, logic
impaired or faith-based mindset against ETs existing/coexisting upon
other than Earth. Not that Earth isn't entirely extra special and
perhaps far between similar wet and badly polluted worlds capable of
accommodating our forms of complex life as is, as well as in the buff,
so to speak.

Speaking of other worlds; if you still can not manage to zoom in and/
or enlarge sufficiently in order to find this complex community of
interesting pixels on your own, much less properly photo enlarge for a
somewhat better view, then perhaps you are not nearly as good at basic
observationology as you think you are. Remember that the small
details of the Venus terrain are in fact quite visible and of
impressive geology formations as is, and of whatever else is looking
as though intelligent created or as modified to suit are those items
of somewhat larger pixel patterns. So, in all fairness you can't
possibly claim seeing one set of pixels as forming a given pattern
related to whatever is perfectly natural, as clearly being the case,
and then not deductively interpret those of other pixels of them more
substantial patterns that look as though anything but natural, or
perhaps that's just my open mindset and otherwise deductive logic
kicking in.
- Brad Guth -

In addition to what I've discovered, and my having been trying in my
dyslexic encrypted ways to share about Venus and our moon for the past
8+ years and counting, it seems there's lots more to behold about good
old Earth that's worth our knowing and sharing, such as the many
interesting discoveries and subsequent topics within the following
link:
www.beforeus.com

Other than deductively interpreting via observationology as to what
looks so perfectly intelligent/artificial of the Venus tarmac,
township/community of large structures, plus the surrounding
infrastructure and of that nearby bridge as looking so gosh darn
rational, I can't be absolutely certain about other intelligent life
still existing/coexisting on Venus, but at least the regular laws of
physics and of the best available science can't possibly exclude such,
because even us humans along with a sufficient degree of applied
technology could make a go of it, especially as representing ETs
capable of getting ourselves to/from Venus would in of itself offer
more than sufficient technological expertise for accommodating an
extended stay in spite of all that geothermally forced environment of
Venus being so geologically newish, hot and otherwise nasty from the
bottom up, and not as we've been told as being entirely greenhouse
roasted from the top down.
.. - Brad Guth


On Mar 6, 9:47 am, BradGuth wrote:
Though many official image archives exist, thanks again to our once
upon a time Usenet contributor "tomcat", for having posted the
optional link to this somewhat older but updated collective page of
our Venus surface images.http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/th...humbnails.html

Some of the most interesting of natural as well as AI(artificial
intelligence) worthy information can be found within image No.17 from
the top left, as clearly situated within the 225 m/pixel composite
frame of view by way of such radar imaging obtained pixels that just
so happens to include the robust, rather sizable and somewhat complex
community of structures with 'GUTH Venus', of which by all means you
should apply your very own PhotoShop or Photo whatever resampling/
enlargement of at least 3X, along with using whatever's your best
unsharp-mask filter plus other image cleaning or contrast options
you'd care to apply. Try to remember, that a purely negative or
naysay mindset of a true rusemaster or of faith-based formulated
denial simply can not accomplish such PhotoShop enlargements, at least
not without making this image look far worse off than it really is.

"Lava channels, Lo Shen Valles, Venus from Magellan Cycle 1"http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/html/object_page/mgn_c115s095_1.htmlhttp://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hires/mgn_c115s095_1.gif

First of all, you do not have to be an Einstein or most any other kind
of wizard, just as long as you're not deductive impaired, logic
impaired or faith-based mindset against ETs existing/coexisting upon
other than Earth. Not that Earth isn't entirely extra special and
perhaps far between similar wet and badly polluted worlds capable of
accommodating our forms of complex life as is, as well as in the buff,
so to speak.

Speaking of other worlds; if you still can not manage to zoom in and/
or enlarge sufficiently in order to find this complex community of
interesting pixels on your own, much less properly photo enlarge for a
somewhat better view, then perhaps you are not nearly as good at basic
observationology as you think you are. Remember that the small
details of the Venus terrain are in fact quite visible and of
impressive geology formations as is, and of whatever else is looking
as though intelligent created or as modified to suit are those items
of somewhat larger pixel patterns. So, in all fairness you can't
possibly claim seeing one set of pixels as forming a given pattern
related to whatever is perfectly natural, as clearly being the case,
and then not deductively interpret those of other pixels of them more
substantial patterns that look as though anything but natural, or
perhaps that's just my open mindset and otherwise deductive logic
kicking in.
- Brad Guth -

On Mar 22, 3:30 pm, BradGuth wrote:
In addition to what I've discovered, and my having been trying in my
dyslexic encrypted ways to share about Venus and our moon for the past
8+ years and counting, it seems there's lots more to behold about good
old Earth that's worth our knowing and sharing, such as the many
interesting discoveries and subsequent topics within the following
link:
www.beforeus.com

Other than deductively interpreting via observationology as to what
looks so perfectly intelligent/artificial of the Venus tarmac,
township/community of large structures, plus the surrounding
infrastructure and of that nearby bridge as looking so gosh darn
rational, I can't be absolutely certain about other intelligent life
still existing/coexisting on Venus, but at least the regular laws of
physics and of the best available science can't possibly exclude such,
because even us humans along with a sufficient degree of applied
technology could make a go of it, especially as representing ETs
capable of getting ourselves to/from Venus would in of itself offer
more than sufficient technological expertise for accommodating an
extended stay in spite of all that geothermally forced environment of
Venus being so geologically newish, hot and otherwise nasty from the
bottom up, and not as we've been told as being entirely greenhouse
roasted from the top down.
. -BradGuth

On Mar 6, 9:47 am, BradGuth wrote:

Though many official image archives exist, thanks again to our once
upon a time Usenet contributor "tomcat", for having posted the
optional link to this somewhat older but updated collective page of
our Venus surface images.http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/th...humbnails.html

Some of the most interesting of natural as well as AI(artificial
intelligence) worthy information can be found within image No.17 from
the top left, as clearly situated within the 225 m/pixel composite
frame of view by way of such radar imaging obtained pixels that just
so happens to include the robust, rather sizable and somewhat complex
community of structures with 'GUTHVenus', of which by all means you
should apply your very own PhotoShop or Photo whatever resampling/
enlargement of at least 3X, along with using whatever's your best
unsharp-mask filter plus other image cleaning or contrast options
you'd care to apply. Try to remember, that a purely negative or
naysay mindset of a true rusemaster or of faith-based formulated
denial simply can not accomplish such PhotoShop enlargements, at least
not without making this image look far worse off than it really is.

"Lava channels, Lo Shen Valles, Venus from Magellan Cycle 1"http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/html/object_page/mgn_c115s095_1.htm...

First of all, you do not have to be an Einstein or most any other kind
of wizard, just as long as you're not deductive impaired, logic
impaired or faith-based mindset against ETs existing/coexisting upon
other than Earth. Not that Earth isn't entirely extra special and
perhaps far between similar wet and badly polluted worlds capable of
accommodating our forms of complex life as is, as well as in the buff,
so to speak.

Speaking of other worlds; if you still can not manage to zoom in and/
or enlarge sufficiently in order to find this complex community of
interesting pixels on your own, much less properly photo enlarge for a
somewhat better view, then perhaps you are not nearly as good at basic
observationology as you think you are. Remember that the small
details of the Venus terrain are in fact quite visible and of
impressive geology formations as is, and of whatever else is looking
as though intelligent created or as modified to suit are those items
of somewhat larger pixel patterns. So, in all fairness you can't
possibly claim seeing one set of pixels as forming a given pattern
related to whatever is perfectly natural, as clearly being the case,
and then not deductively interpret those of other pixels of them more
substantial patterns that look as though anything but natural, or
perhaps that's just my open mindset and otherwise deductive logic
kicking in.
-BradGuth-

Good freaking grief almighty on a stick, now my topics are getting
cloned, mugged and/or hijacked by those intent upon skewing the facts,
or trying every dirty trick in their infidel book in order to topic/
author stalk and bash, along with allowing of others to simply topic
spam the living crapolla out of these Google/NOVA Usenet Groups.

Of all the other sorts of gabi40, Clint Eastwood, susi40, susi40001,
susi40006, mirror server, kgkgjkgkgkfgk and perhaps countless other
trash or spam topics getting forced into the Usenet stack, whereas
oddly these silly clownish efforts do not seem to bother those in
charge of this or any other Usenet group. Why is that?

Are these clownish methods of stuffing or force-feeding topics as
faith-based approved, so as to intentionally block out or displace all
others, or is this Usenet Group trashing tactic merely of something
MI5/CIA approved?

All I know for certain, is if their Zionist puppet Hitler were still
alive, as such he'd be a very happy camper.
.. - Brad Guth

On Mar 6, 9:47 am, BradGuth wrote:
Though many official image archives exist, thanks again to our once
upon a time Usenet contributor "tomcat", for having posted the
optional link to this somewhat older but updated collective page of
our Venus surface images.http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/th...humbnails.html

Some of the most interesting of natural as well as AI(artificial
intelligence) worthy information can be found within image No.17 from
the top left, as clearly situated within the 225 m/pixel composite
frame of view by way of such radar imaging obtained pixels that just
so happens to include the robust, rather sizable and somewhat complex
community of structures with 'GUTH Venus', of which by all means you
should apply your very own PhotoShop or Photo whatever resampling/
enlargement of at least 3X, along with using whatever's your best
unsharp-mask filter plus other image cleaning or contrast options
you'd care to apply. Try to remember, that a purely negative or
naysay mindset of a true rusemaster or of faith-based formulated
denial simply can not accomplish such PhotoShop enlargements, at least
not without making this image look far worse off than it really is.

"Lava channels, Lo Shen Valles, Venus from Magellan Cycle 1"http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/html/object_page/mgn_c115s095_1.htmlhttp://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hires/mgn_c115s095_1.gif

First of all, you do not have to be an Einstein or most any other kind
of wizard, just as long as you're not deductive impaired, logic
impaired or faith-based mindset against ETs existing/coexisting upon
other than Earth. Not that Earth isn't entirely extra special and
perhaps far between similar wet and badly polluted worlds capable of
accommodating our forms of complex life as is, as well as in the buff,
so to speak.

Speaking of other worlds; if you still can not manage to zoom in and/
or enlarge sufficiently in order to find this complex community of
interesting pixels on your own, much less properly photo enlarge for a
somewhat better view, then perhaps you are not nearly as good at basic
observationology as you think you are. Remember that the small
details of the Venus terrain are in fact quite visible and of
impressive geology formations as is, and of whatever else is looking
as though intelligent created or as modified to suit are those items
of somewhat larger pixel patterns. So, in all fairness you can't
possibly claim seeing one set of pixels as forming a given pattern
related to whatever is perfectly natural, as clearly being the case,
and then not deductively interpret those of other pixels of them more
substantial patterns that look as though anything but natural, or
perhaps that's just my open mindset and otherwise deductive logic
kicking in.
- Brad Guth -

This topic belongs on top of the Usenet stack. If you are smarter
than a fifth grader, go right ahead and contribute something on behalf
of the planet Venus.
.. - BG

On Mar 25, 8:43 pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Mar 6, 9:47 am, BradGuth wrote:



Though many official image archives exist, thanks again to our once
upon a time Usenet contributor "tomcat", for having posted the
optional link to this somewhat older but updated collective page of
our Venus surface images.http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/th...humbnails.html

Some of the most interesting of natural as well as AI(artificial
intelligence) worthy information can be found within image No.17 from
the top left, as clearly situated within the 225 m/pixel composite
frame of view by way of such radar imaging obtained pixels that just
so happens to include the robust, rather sizable and somewhat complex
community of structures with 'GUTH Venus', of which by all means you
should apply your very own PhotoShop or Photo whatever resampling/
enlargement of at least 3X, along with using whatever's your best
unsharp-mask filter plus other image cleaning or contrast options
you'd care to apply. Try to remember, that a purely negative or
naysay mindset of a true rusemaster or of faith-based formulated
denial simply can not accomplish such PhotoShop enlargements, at least
not without making this image look far worse off than it really is.

"Lava channels, Lo Shen Valles, Venus from Magellan Cycle 1"http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/html/object_page/mgn_c115s095_1.htm...

First of all, you do not have to be an Einstein or most any other kind
of wizard, just as long as you're not deductive impaired, logic
impaired or faith-based mindset against ETs existing/coexisting upon
other than Earth. Not that Earth isn't entirely extra special and
perhaps far between similar wet and badly polluted worlds capable of
accommodating our forms of complex life as is, as well as in the buff,
so to speak.

Speaking of other worlds; if you still can not manage to zoom in and/
or enlarge sufficiently in order to find this complex community of
interesting pixels on your own, much less properly photo enlarge for a
somewhat better view, then perhaps you are not nearly as good at basic
observationology as you think you are. Remember that the small
details of the Venus terrain are in fact quite visible and of
impressive geology formations as is, and of whatever else is looking
as though intelligent created or as modified to suit are those items
of somewhat larger pixel patterns. So, in all fairness you can't
possibly claim seeing one set of pixels as forming a given pattern
related to whatever is perfectly natural, as clearly being the case,
and then not deductively interpret those of other pixels of them more
substantial patterns that look as though anything but natural, or
perhaps that's just my open mindset and otherwise deductive logic
kicking in.
- Brad Guth -

This topic belongs on top of the Usenet stack. If you are smarter
than a fifth grader, go right ahead and contribute something on behalf
of the planet Venus.
. - BG

Interesting to notice all the usual mainstream damage-control via
those infowar spam topics, and of each having those key words so that
the public, various schools and private media are continually
snookered and otherwise getting summarily dumbfounded past the point
of no return.

Apparently folks in high places do not like this public Usenet, or
most any other public accessible forum going unchecked.
.. - Brad Guth

BradGuth wrote:
On Mar 6, 9:47 am, BradGuth wrote:
Though many official image archives exist, thanks again to our once
upon a time Usenet contributor "tomcat", for having posted the
optional link to this somewhat older but updated collective page of
our Venus surface images.http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/th...humbnails.html

Some of the most interesting of natural as well as AI(artificial
intelligence) worthy information can be found within image No.17 from
the top left, as clearly situated within the 225 m/pixel composite
frame of view by way of such radar imaging obtained pixels that just
so happens to include the robust, rather sizable and somewhat complex
community of structures with 'GUTH Venus', of which by all means you
should apply your very own PhotoShop or Photo whatever resampling/
enlargement of at least 3X, along with using whatever's your best
unsharp-mask filter plus other image cleaning or contrast options
you'd care to apply. Try to remember, that a purely negative or
naysay mindset of a true rusemaster or of faith-based formulated
denial simply can not accomplish such PhotoShop enlargements, at least
not without making this image look far worse off than it really is.

"Lava channels, Lo Shen Valles, Venus from Magellan Cycle 1"http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/html/object_page/mgn_c115s095_1.htmlhttp://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hires/mgn_c115s095_1.gif

First of all, you do not have to be an Einstein or most any other kind
of wizard, just as long as you're not deductive impaired, logic
impaired or faith-based mindset against ETs existing/coexisting upon
other than Earth. Not that Earth isn't entirely extra special and
perhaps far between similar wet and badly polluted worlds capable of
accommodating our forms of complex life as is, as well as in the buff,
so to speak.

Speaking of other worlds; if you still can not manage to zoom in and/
or enlarge sufficiently in order to find this complex community of
interesting pixels on your own, much less properly photo enlarge for a
somewhat better view, then perhaps you are not nearly as good at basic
observationology as you think you are. Remember that the small
details of the Venus terrain are in fact quite visible and of
impressive geology formations as is, and of whatever else is looking
as though intelligent created or as modified to suit are those items
of somewhat larger pixel patterns. So, in all fairness you can't
possibly claim seeing one set of pixels as forming a given pattern
related to whatever is perfectly natural, as clearly being the case,
and then not deductively interpret those of other pixels of them more
substantial patterns that look as though anything but natural, or
perhaps that's just my open mindset and otherwise deductive logic
kicking in.
- Brad Guth -

This topic belongs on top of the Usenet stack. If you are smarter
than a fifth grader, go right ahead and contribute something on behalf
of the planet Venus.
. - BG

Sulfuric acid.
--
ah

On Mar 29, 6:32 am, ah wrote:
BradGuth wrote:
On Mar 6, 9:47 am, BradGuth wrote:
Though many official image archives exist, thanks again to our once
upon a time Usenet contributor "tomcat", for having posted the
optional link to this somewhat older but updated collective page of
our Venus surface images.http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/th...humbnails.html

Some of the most interesting of natural as well as AI(artificial
intelligence) worthy information can be found within image No.17 from
the top left, as clearly situated within the 225 m/pixel composite
frame of view by way of such radar imaging obtained pixels that just
so happens to include the robust, rather sizable and somewhat complex
community of structures with 'GUTHVenus', of which by all means you
should apply your very own PhotoShop or Photo whatever resampling/
enlargement of at least 3X, along with using whatever's your best
unsharp-mask filter plus other image cleaning or contrast options
you'd care to apply. Try to remember, that a purely negative or
naysay mindset of a true rusemaster or of faith-based formulated
denial simply can not accomplish such PhotoShop enlargements, at least
not without making this image look far worse off than it really is.

"Lava channels, Lo Shen Valles, Venus from Magellan Cycle 1"http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/html/object_page/mgn_c115s095_1.htm...

First of all, you do not have to be an Einstein or most any other kind
of wizard, just as long as you're not deductive impaired, logic
impaired or faith-based mindset against ETs existing/coexisting upon
other than Earth. Not that Earth isn't entirely extra special and
perhaps far between similar wet and badly polluted worlds capable of
accommodating our forms of complex life as is, as well as in the buff,
so to speak.

Speaking of other worlds; if you still can not manage to zoom in and/
or enlarge sufficiently in order to find this complex community of
interesting pixels on your own, much less properly photo enlarge for a
somewhat better view, then perhaps you are not nearly as good at basic
observationology as you think you are. Remember that the small
details of the Venus terrain are in fact quite visible and of
impressive geology formations as is, and of whatever else is looking
as though intelligent created or as modified to suit are those items
of somewhat larger pixel patterns. So, in all fairness you can't
possibly claim seeing one set of pixels as forming a given pattern
related to whatever is perfectly natural, as clearly being the case,
and then not deductively interpret those of other pixels of them more
substantial patterns that look as though anything but natural, or
perhaps that's just my open mindset and otherwise deductive logic
kicking in.
-BradGuth-

This topic belongs on top of the Usenet stack. If you are smarter
than a fifth grader, go right ahead and contribute something on behalf
of the planet Venus.
. - BG

Sulfuric acid.
--
ah

That's 100% true, as those clearly thick acidic clouds could be as S8
loaded down to the point of their containing as much as being worth
75% sulphuric acid, of which leaves their other 25% as CO2 and water
vapor. The cloud average may actually be closer to 66%/33%, with
those upper cloud layers being primarily of water and perhaps worth as
little as 25% S8.

Of course, below 25 km and most certainly upon the crystal dry surface
that's so toasty hot from the inside out is where S8 is actually a
perfectly harmless substance, that is unless your naked butt is parked
over any one of those many geothermally forced vents of extremely hot
CO2 and S8.
.. - Brad Guth