![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Whenever sharing about our moon or Venus, it's exactly as though we're
not being told the whole truth and nothing but the truth about much of anything these days. Talk about revising history, science and a whole lot more, whereas those hot rocks of Venus that so happen to look as though having been arranged so gosh darn unusually intelligent, are most likely still there to behold, and we've had the technology for having taken a much closer look-see for better than a good decade. This observationology of image interpretation isn't the least bit hocus-pocus phony, nor is it having any ulterior motives or hidden agenda like our mutually perpetrated cold-war(s), or even hot-war(s) over fossil and yellowcake energy as of lately, and there's nothing but an all around win-win for science and humanity if in fact any of those hot rocks of Venus are actually of those modified and/or having been put to good use by intelligent other life. At least there's nothing about Venus that's technically all that insurmountable, that is unless you're not quite half as smart as a hot rock. The official NASA/Magellan image of GIF format, as being that of a 36 look per pixel composite as having been given essentially the benefit of those 36 confirming radar looks per each pixel, is by itself worthy of our consideration for all kinds of honest reasons besides those patterns of whatever's interpreting as so AI /(intelligent/ artificial), as opposed to all of the perfectly natural appearing items that are of equally outstanding planetology, such as the impressive FLUID ARCH. The big question of the day is; Does anyone within Google/NOVA's usenetland of such all-knowing wizards care to discuss/review the long and growing list of what-ifs? (after all, for all we know those hot- foot Venusians could even be of a Zion/semitic faith) For a topic starter, we are obviously not talking about any cool and wet Earth like environment, or even that of our weird, naked and somewhat salty moon, nor of any such dead and nearly frozen to the core likes of Mars or of whatever's so much further away. At times Venus is actually extremely nearby (a little over 100X the distance of our moon), and it's absolutely chuck full of its very own geothermal cache of raw energy that's sharing a surface of 20.5 w/m2 (roughly 256 fold greater than Earth), that which only a born-again dork of a naysayer like most of our usenet anti-think-tank rusemasters couldn't possibly appreciate. Why exclude the unknown simply because it's unknown? In other words, most likely your whole intellectual mindset worth of whatever's supposedly wiser and thus greater than most, that's simply faiyjh- based obligated on behalf of what has to go out of its infomercial spewing way in order to exclude upon any such off-world intelligent other life, regardless of whatever's the applied technology, or even to banish anything that's of off-world intelligent potential regardless of whatever's the alternative planetology and of its local evolution, of which you and I know absolutely nothing about is what seems a bit counter-productive. If at all possible, please do further explain as to those very intelligent and/or rational community looking items, as if somehow those were being purely natural, by way of offering us some other image examples, as to sharing in where such a rational complex community looking group of planetology considerations are otherwise to be found within common/terrestrial planetology w/o AI benefit of whatever intelligent life accomplished, such as right here on Earth should offer. For one basic observationology argument example; How many complex looking tarmacs are there on Earth that had absolutely nothing whatsoever of AI to do with their having been created or otherwise crafted/modified for their rational use by intelligent life? Thanks once again to our once upon a time "tomcat", for once having posted a link to this updated page of Venus images. http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/th...humbnails.html Some of the most interesting AI information can be found within image No.17 from the top left, as being the 225 m/pixel composite frame of such radar obtained pixels that so happens to include the robust, rather sizable and somewhat complex community of 'GUTH Venus', of which you should apply your own PhotoShop/resampling enlargement of at least 3X, along with whatever unsharp mask filter plus other image cleaning or treatment options you'd care to apply. Remember that a purely negative or naysay mindset of a true rusemaster simply can't accomplish such PhotoShop enlargements without making the image look worse off than it really is. "Lava channels, Lo Shen Valles, Venus from Magellan Cycle 1" http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/ht...115s095_1.html http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hi...c115s095_1.gif If you still can not find this community of interesting pixels, then you are not nearly as good at observationology as you think you are. - Brad Guth - |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The hot rocks of Venus, looking intelligent | BradGuth | Policy | 53 | January 3rd 08 03:07 PM |
The hot rocks of Venus, looking intelligent | BradGuth | History | 59 | January 3rd 08 03:07 PM |
The hot rocks of Venus, looking intelligent | BradGuth | Astronomy Misc | 51 | January 3rd 08 03:07 PM |
The hot rocks of Venus, looking intelligent compared to Adolph Deco...... | Double-A[_2_] | Misc | 1 | October 14th 07 05:46 AM |