Space Ring Could Shade Earth and Stop Global Warming

BONZ0 wrote:

You won't need them for the coming ice age!

Regards

B0NZ0

You know what would really be fun, BONZ0?
If you actually had the courage to put your real name on what you'd
written, unlike the million other little cowards who will say anything
as long as their true identity is never known, and well never to be
answerable for it.
Real brave, BONZ0... real brave indeed.
At least you didn't use a anonymous Hotmail account, and for that I
salute you.
It shows the degree of courage I would associate with a red squirrel,
and by North Dakota standards, that's really something.
Better that a gopher or sparrow, for instance.
But not anywhere near a badger. :-D

Patrick Clinton Flannery

Why would anybody ever TRUST Bonz0 after watching him lie and weasle
in public?

On Apr 8, 7:29 pm, "BONZ0" wrote:

Regards

B0NZ0
Dr. Richard Lindzen, MIT meteorology professor and member of the National

Why would anybody ever TRUST Bonz0 after watching him lie and weasle
in public?

Why does he even cross-post to places he will get caught lying, and
then have the lies exposed on invest groups?

The CORRUPT RICHARD S. LINDZEN, DESPICABLE OUTCAST OF SCIENCE

(Climatology) DOCTOR Richard Lindzen speaks about passive smoke and
health, Next up, prominent ROOFER discusses faults in modern Quantum
Mechanics Theory.
=========================
Philip Morris
Passive Smoking: How Great A Hazard?
Date: 19910700/P
Length: 48 pages
http://tobaccodocuments.org/pm/2046323437-3484.html

Page 36: cyb09e00
Richard Lindzen, of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, has
emphasized that problems will arise where we will need to depend on
scientific judgement, and by ruining our credibility now we leave
society with a resource of some importance diminished. The
implementation of public policies must be based on good science, to
the degree that it is available, and not on emotion or on political
needs. Those who develop such policies must not stray from sound
scientific investigations, based only on accepted scientific
methodologies. Such has not always been the case with environmental
tobacco smoke.

=========================

In 1993 documents appeared in secret tobacco conspiracy file cabinets
about a fake science conference organized by the documented corrupt S.
Fred Singer. This meeting in Washington, DC, was facetiously titled
"Scientific Integrity in the Public Policy Process", funded by two
lung-killer industries tobacco and asbestos, and Lindzen was a
prominant hoaxer at this event. Lindzen has been paid in a CRIMINAL
CONSPIRACY to defraud the public on the immanent dangers of Global
Warming, just as he participated with co-conspirators to aid Singer's
science hoaxes on behalf of tobacco and asbestos SERIAL MURDERER
CORPORATIONS.

Every single fact below can stand up in court in the trial of Lindzen
for FELONY CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY. Much more incriminating evidence will
be adduced at trial.

Google search engine reports 164 results looking for Richard S.
Lindzen AND "Washington Times" owned by the convicted felon Sun Myung
Moon. Moon has hosted many fake science conferences to exploit for
propaganda purposes. Singer apprenteced the fake science conference
back when Singer was President of the moonie "Washingon Institute for
Values in Public Policy". No records exist in public archives on what
Moon paid Singer as president of the Wash Inst, but here is a link
showing how generous Moon is to one successor president after Singer's
term -- $142,708/yr salary.
http://documents.guidestar.org/1998/...293998-1-9.pdf

Moon is master of money laundering and subversive payoffs -- we will
never know who all he paid and how much they pocketed. We do know that
Google search engine finds 152 webpages linking Moon AND Lindzen.
There is an unseemly association between a science corruptor and a
known identified corrupt Lindzen: 314 webpage results for Lindzen AND
"Sun Myung Moon" OR "Washington Times".

http://tobaccodocuments.org/mayo_clinic/2025498346.html SUBJECT: The
Heidelberg Appeal Date: 23 Mar 1993

BACKGROUND

This coalition has its roots in the asbestos industry, but has become
a broad and independent movement in a littlc bit less than a year. We
are involved with the coalition through the French NMA, but we are
being discreet because some of the coalition members are concerned
about a "tobacco connection".

Our strategy is to continue discreetly supporting the coalition and
help it grow in size and credibility. The timing is particularly
opportune because of Bill Clinton's sympathy to the messages of the
coalition (see attached IHT article).

If you would like more information on how to help support thc
movement, pIease contact me or Tom Borelli on the US side.

http://tobaccodocuments.org/pm/2502284041-4042.html
(Philip Morris Documents)
Scientific Integrity in the Public Policy Process Semi-Final Program
930524 - 930525 the Madison Hotel 15th and M Streets, Nw Washington,
D.C. Date: 19930525/D
Length: 2 pages

Persons identified in pulling off this science hoax included: CORRUPT
Michael Fumento, CORRUPT Michael Gough, CORRUPT Robert Jastrow,
CORRUPT Michael Salomon, CORRUPT Robert Tollison, and the arch-
CORRUPTOR S. Fred Singer ringleader.

http://www.disinfopedia.org/wiki.pht...ard_S._Lindzen

Richard S. Lindzen

Dr. Richard S. Lindzen, a distinguished professor of meteorology at
MIT, is one of a small band of global warming skeptics used by
industry to undermine and delay any kind of regulatory action meant to
address the looming environmental crisis.

Lindzen was reported in 1995 to "charges oil and coal interests $2,500
a day for his consulting services; his 1991 trip to testify before a
Senate committee was paid for by Western Fuels, and a speech he wrote,
entitled 'Global Warming: the Origin and Nature of Alleged Scientific
Consensus,' was underwritten by OPEC." [1]

According to Ross Gelbspan, Lindzen and skeptics like him -- including
Dr. Pat Michaels, Dr. Robert Balling, Dr. Sherwood Idso, and Dr. S.
Fred Singer, among others -- "assert flatly that their science is
untainted by funding. Nevertheless, in this persistent and well-funded
campaign of [global warming] denial they have become interchangeable
ornaments on the hood of a high-powered engine of disinformation.
Their dissenting opinions are amplified beyond all proportion through
the media while the concerns of the dominant majority of the world's
scientific establishment are marginalized. By keeping the discussion
focused on whether there is a problem in the first place, they have
effectively silenced the debate over what to do about it." [2]

External links

* Ross Gelbspan, "The Heat is On: The warming of the world's
climate sparks a blaze of denial," Harper's magazine, December 1995.
* Daniel Grossman, Dissent in the Maelstrom,"Scientific American,
November 2001.
* "Richard Lindzen," Wikipedia.

http://dieoff.org/page82.htm
THE HEAT IS ON:
The warming of the world's climate sparks a blaze of denial
by Ross Gelbspan.
from HARPER'S MAGAZINE/December, 1995

.... The people who run the world's oil and coal companies know that
the march of science, and of political action, may be slowed by
disinformation. In the last year and a half, one of the leading oil
industry public relations outlets, the Global Climate Coalition, has
spent more than a million dollars to downplay the threat of climate
change. It expects to spend another $850,000 on the issue next year.
Similarly, the National Coal Association spent more than $700,000 on
the global climate issue in 1992 and 1993. In 1993 alone, the American
Petroleum Institute, just one of fifty-four industry members of the
GCC, paid $1.8 million to the public relations firm of Burson-
Marsteller partly in an effort to defeat a proposed tax on fossil
fuels. For perspective, this is only slightly less than the combined
yearly expenditures on global warming of the five major environmental
groups that focus on climate issues -- about $2.1 million, according
to officials of the Environmental Defense Fund, the Natural Resources
Defense Council, the Sierra Club, the Union of Concerned Scientists,
and the World Wildlife Fund.

For the most part the industry has relied on a small band of skeptics
-- Dr. Richard S. Lindzen, Dr. Pat Michaels, Dr. Robert Balling, Dr.
Sherwood Idso, and Dr. S. Fred Singer, among others -- who have proven
extraordinarily adept at draining the issue of all sense of crisis.
Through their frequent pronouncements in the press and on radio and
television, they have helped to create the illusion that the question
is hopelessly mired in unknowns. Most damaging has been their
influence on decision makers; their contrarian views have allowed
conservative Republicans such as Representative Dana Rohrabacher (R.,
Calif.) to dismiss legitimate research concerns as "liberal claptrap"
and have provided the basis for the recent round of budget cuts to
those government science programs designed to monitor the health of
the planet.

Last May, Minnesota held hearings in St. Paul to determine the
environmental cost of coal burning by state power plants. Three of the
skeptics -- Lindzen, Michaels, and Balling -- were hired as expert
witnesses to testify on behalf of Western Fuels Association, a $400
million consortium of coal suppliers and coal-fired utilities.
[#1] ...

[#l In 1991, Western Fuels spent an estimated $250,000 to produce and
distribute a video entitled "The Greening of Planet Earth," which was
shown frequently inside the Bush White House as well as within the
governments of OPEC. In near-evangelical tones, the video promises
that a new age of agricultural abundance will result from increasing
concentrations of carbon dioxide. It portrays a world where vast areas
of desert are reclaimed by the carbon dioxide-forced growth of new
grasslands, where the earth's diminishing forests are replenished by a
nurturing atmosphere. Unfortunately, it overlooks the bugs. Experts
note that even a minor elevation in temperature would trigger an
explosion in the planet's insect population, leading to potentially
significant disruptions in food supplies from crop damage as well as
to a surge in insect-borne diseases. It appears that Western Fuels'
video fails to tell people what the termites in New Orleans may be
trying to tell them now.]

On Apr 6, 1:39 pm, "
wrote:
Space Ring Could Shade Earth and Stop Global Warming:http://www.livescience.com/technolog..._solution.html

Inject Sulfur into Air to Battle Global Warming:http://www.livescience.com/environme...ct_sulfur.html

Longer Airline Flights Proposed to Combat Global Warming:http://www.livescience.com/environme...l_climate.html

All About Global Warming:http://www.livescience.com/globalwarming/

Actually, I sort of like that sulfur idea, such as Venus has lots of
S8 to deal with, and as a result there's damn little solar energy that
gets down to the deck.

Most of the Venus heat of its envuironment is geothermally forced,
from the core on out, and to think that Venus is so newish and that it
doesn't even have a nearby massive moon causing any of its GW trauma.
-
Brad Guth

On Apr 6, 1:39 pm, "
wrote:
Space Ring Could Shade Earth and Stop Global Warming:http://www.livescience.com/technolog..._solution.html

Inject Sulfur into Air to Battle Global Warming:http://www.livescience.com/environme...ct_sulfur.html

Longer Airline Flights Proposed to Combat Global Warming:http://www.livescience.com/environme...l_climate.html

All About Global Warming:http://www.livescience.com/globalwarming/

Relocating our moon into the Earth L1 slot would buy us solar
isolation shade to burn (sort of speak), not to mention a 1/16th
factor of the moon's gravity/tidal worth of GW related trauma
moderation as a little side benefit.
-
Brad Guth

The visible SOCIOPATHY of Reichwinger

Apparently you are not qualified to diagnose your own evident
sociopathy.

I conveniently provided a webpage with the most conspicuous symptoms
listed: you don't need them all -- just three is sufficient for a
positive diagnosis.

http://h2-pv.us/Bush-Hitler/Blogspot/Sociopathy.html
DSM-IV-TR Handbook of Differential Diagnosis
by Michael B. First, Allen, MD Frances, Harold Alan, MD Pincus
Paperback: 247 pages
Publisher: American Psychiatric Association; 1st edition (January,
2002)
ISBN: 1585620548

SOCIOPATHY
The DSM-IV-TR, a widely used manual for diagnosing mental disorders,
defines anti-social personality disorder as a pervasive pattern of
disregard for and violation of the rights of others occurring since
age 15 years, as indicated by three (or more) of the following:

1. failure to conform to social norms with respect to lawful
behaviors as indicated by repeatedly performing acts that are grounds
for arrest
2. deceitfulness, as indicated by repeated lying, use of aliases,
or conning others for personal profit or pleasure
3. impulsivity or failure to plan ahead
4. aggressiveness, as indicated by repeated physical fights or
assaults
5. reckless disregard for safety of self or others
6. consistent irresponsibility
7. lack of remorse, as indicated by being indifferent to or
rationalizing having hurt, mistreated, or stolen from another

In this case, we see symptoms #3, lack of future
planning, #2 lying, #4 aggressiveness towards those who can't stop
your
killing them from their position of vulnerability, #5 reckless,
disregard for those damaged by your words and acts, #6 no accepting
responsibility for what you are doing, #7 no remorse, and #1 is known
that you accept the criminal frauds of others and use them to your
purposes, making you a known accessory after the fact.

Did I leave anything out?

On Apr 8, 12:25 pm, "Toxic Meme Germs"
wrote:

Did I leave anything out?

As far as we can tell, only the truth.
-
Brad Guth

wrote:
Space Ring Could Shade Earth and Stop Global Warming:
http://www.livescience.com/technolog..._solution.html

Inject Sulfur into Air to Battle Global Warming:
http://www.livescience.com/environme...ct_sulfur.html

Longer Airline Flights Proposed to Combat Global Warming:
http://www.livescience.com/environme...l_climate.html

Oh, well.

As it turns out, we'll probably have to nuke Iran, and *that* will
raise enough dust to put a serious dent into global warming for a
while.

But really, what we *should* be doing is stopping global warming
without destroying the economy. Nuclear power. Thorium breeder
reactors. Then world peace won't cause catastrophic climate change.

John Savard

On Apr 10, 5:01 pm, "Quadibloc" wrote:

As it turns out, we'll probably have to nuke Iran, and *that* will
raise enough dust to put a serious dent into global warming for a
while.

But really, what we *should* be doing is stopping global warming
without destroying the economy. Nuclear power. Thorium breeder
reactors. Then world peace won't cause catastrophic climate change.

John Savard

Nuclear blasted dust = global dimming and subsequently greater
nighttime cloud cover.

Global dimming = more solar derived heat, and somewhat better heat
retention (not less)

A highly reflective atmospheric layer of S8 would accomplish a degree
of solar IR isolation, although S8 is simply too heavy to stay aloft
for any significant amount of time.

Sorry about that.
-
Brad Guth