A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Why Did The Universe Break Apart??



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 8th 06, 01:34 PM posted to alt.astronomy
G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,860
Default Why Did The Universe Break Apart??

After the big bang the universe never collapse inward on itself, it kept
spreading out,but not in a smooth pattern Hmmmm It broke itself up
into huge chunks of mostly hydrogen gas. Logical thinking dictates one
big galaxy,and not a trillion galaxies separated by millions of light
years. This begs the question ( WHY? ) Bert PS My time lapse
theory gives the best answer so far

  #2  
Old October 8th 06, 05:48 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Hagar[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,309
Default Why Did The Universe Break Apart??


"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message
...
After the big bang the universe never collapse inward on itself, it kept
spreading out,but not in a smooth pattern Hmmmm It broke itself up
into huge chunks of mostly hydrogen gas. Logical thinking dictates one
big galaxy,and not a trillion galaxies separated by millions of light
years. This begs the question ( WHY? ) Bert PS My time lapse
theory gives the best answer so far


Beeert, Beeeert, Beeert ... all this stuff was explained to you before, time
and again. Yet you go and get hammered on Bud, pass out and then promptly
forget everything you learned that day.

Look at ANY explosion (there should be a zillion clips available, on-line).
You will see that the expanding pressure shell is not linear. The billowing
is caused by pressure differentials in the expanding shell, pretty much like
shortly after the BB. While an Earthly explosion is eventually halted by the
Earth's gravity and the resistance of the surrounding atmosphere, the BB had
no such obstacles. Since the mass distribution was not homogenous, some
parts of the expanding material traveled at a slightly higher clip than the
slightly less dense areas. This set up small eddies between the two. These
eddies then accumulated mass and with mass they developed gravity, which in
turn attracted more mass etc. Since this occurred at all directions and
distances from the original focal point of the BB, the earliest stars were
formed at random distances from each other. They became the original Super
Giants, who exhausted their lives in Supernovae, in a relatively short time,
to become the first black holes. They, in turn, attracted more cosmic
stuff, which then formed the preset day galaxies. All the original galaxies
were of the spiral variety, however, when two of them collided, they merged
into one spherical galaxy.

  #3  
Old October 8th 06, 10:26 PM posted to alt.astronomy
G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,860
Default Why Did The Universe Break Apart??

Hagar Hagar Hagar (The horrible) I read that crappy explanation many
times. If you had a Bud to flush the cobwebs out of your brain you would
know most of that theory is ****. If you were not such a parrot I could
discuss the reasons it does not fit . Mean while This Bud's on me
"cheers" Bert

  #4  
Old October 8th 06, 11:52 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Starman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 254
Default Why Did The Universe Break Apart??

what should stop it from expanding, and "collapse inward on itself" ?

please stop drinking and use common sense instead,
nothing and i mean nothing logical indicates one huge galaxy, instead of
trillions of galaxies

this is my "Bert drinks too much theory" and can be used to answer the
question (why?) every time Bert publish a theory with missing logic

Bert don't take it personal, but now and then you gotta used known facts if
you want to understand things

"G=EMC^2 Glazier" skrev i en meddelelse
...
After the big bang the universe never collapse inward on itself, it kept
spreading out,but not in a smooth pattern Hmmmm It broke itself up
into huge chunks of mostly hydrogen gas. Logical thinking dictates one
big galaxy,and not a trillion galaxies separated by millions of light
years. This begs the question ( WHY? ) Bert PS My time lapse
theory gives the best answer so far


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeg beskyttes af den gratis SPAMfighter til privatbrugere.
Den har indtil videre sparet mig for at få 35 spam-mails
Betalende brugere får ikke denne besked i deres e-mails.
Hent en gratis SPAMfighter her.


  #5  
Old October 9th 06, 01:49 AM posted to alt.astronomy
Hagar[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,309
Default Why Did The Universe Break Apart??


"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message
...
Hagar Hagar Hagar (The horrible) I read that crappy explanation many
times. If you had a Bud to flush the cobwebs out of your brain you would
know most of that theory is ****. If you were not such a parrot I could
discuss the reasons it does not fit . Mean while This Bud's on me
"cheers" Bert


Back to the Beeeer, Beeeert. It seems I'm not the only one who disagrees
with your convoluted concoctions. Go ahead, sleep it off and take another
stab at it.

  #6  
Old October 9th 06, 04:45 AM posted to alt.astronomy
Scott Miller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 438
Default Why Did The Universe Break Apart??

G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
After the big bang the universe never collapse inward on itself, it kept
spreading out,but not in a smooth pattern Hmmmm It broke itself up
into huge chunks of mostly hydrogen gas. Logical thinking dictates one
big galaxy,and not a trillion galaxies separated by millions of light
years. This begs the question ( WHY? ) Bert PS My time lapse
theory gives the best answer so far


Or you could simply learn some physics. Suggest you look up something
called Jeans length - an object will grow from a density fluctuation
provided that the fluctuation extends over a distance taht exceeds the
Jeans length. This was discovered by James Jeans back in 1902 and is
consistent with the fluctuations seen in the background radiation a la
WMAP and COBE. No need for some (non)theory you think you have found
(of course we can get into the definition of theory from a science
standpoint but then that would simply prove how little you really know).
  #7  
Old October 9th 06, 01:10 PM posted to alt.astronomy
G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,860
Default Why Did The Universe Break Apart??

Starman Stop using the word facts The word fact means 100% true (truth
of reality) We are talking about actions that took place 22 billion
years ago ,the spacetime of the big bang. Speculation (yes) Theories
(yes) 'but facts' ???? Bert

  #8  
Old October 9th 06, 01:33 PM posted to alt.astronomy
G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,860
Default Why Did The Universe Break Apart??

Scott you find fault with every thing I say. You do not know my latest
time lapse theory and you are already knocking it. I doubt very much if
you are a teacher. What school would want a person that has so little
respect for another person's original thinking. That guy Jeans did not
have accelerators,or Hubble space telescope back in 1902. Best you keep
that in mind. Oops I forgot you have no mind of your own. You are a
parrot. Reality is its the parrot brains that attack me personally,and
can only find fault with every one of my theories. Shame on you all
Reality is some of my theories have been discussed in schools in many
countries,and words like "fascinating",challenging" and have you
published have been used Go figure Bert

  #9  
Old October 9th 06, 06:47 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Double-A[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,516
Default Why Did The Universe Break Apart??


Scott Miller wrote:
G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
After the big bang the universe never collapse inward on itself, it kept
spreading out,but not in a smooth pattern Hmmmm It broke itself up
into huge chunks of mostly hydrogen gas. Logical thinking dictates one
big galaxy,and not a trillion galaxies separated by millions of light
years. This begs the question ( WHY? ) Bert PS My time lapse
theory gives the best answer so far


Or you could simply learn some physics. Suggest you look up something
called Jeans length - an object will grow from a density fluctuation
provided that the fluctuation extends over a distance taht exceeds the
Jeans length. This was discovered by James Jeans back in 1902 and is
consistent with the fluctuations seen in the background radiation a la
WMAP and COBE. No need for some (non)theory you think you have found
(of course we can get into the definition of theory from a science
standpoint but then that would simply prove how little you really know).



I read a book by Sir James Jeans in my adolescence, "The Growth of
Physical Science". He was a good writer as well as a scientist.

Double-A

  #10  
Old October 9th 06, 11:19 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Starman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 254
Default Why Did The Universe Break Apart??

Facts = established knowledge, that is not nessesary the same as 100 % true,
facts can even change

(eg. I have 2 cars, that is fact, but if i get 1 more i have 3 and then my
facts have changed)

no we are NOT talking about actions that took place 22 billion years ago,
it's more like 13 -14 billion years ago

is there trillions of galaxies? you say speculation, theories, I say fact
did the universe break up in BB? you say speculation, theories, I say fact

if logical thinking tells you one big galaxy, then BB wouldn't be possible,
therefor it's not logical thinking

Where have you published your "time lapse theory" ?

And why did you choose to take it personally anyway ? ;-)

"G=EMC^2 Glazier" skrev i en meddelelse
...
Starman Stop using the word facts The word fact means 100% true (truth
of reality) We are talking about actions that took place 22 billion
years ago ,the spacetime of the big bang. Speculation (yes) Theories
(yes) 'but facts' ???? Bert

--- Berts first post inserted here

After the big bang the universe never collapse inward on itself, it kept
spreading out,but not in a smooth pattern Hmmmm It broke itself up
into huge chunks of mostly hydrogen gas. Logical thinking dictates one
big galaxy,and not a trillion galaxies separated by millions of light
years. This begs the question ( WHY? ) Bert PS My time lapse
theory gives the best answer so far


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeg beskyttes af den gratis SPAMfighter til privatbrugere.
Den har indtil videre sparet mig for at få 46 spam-mails
Betalende brugere får ikke denne besked i deres e-mails.
Hent en gratis SPAMfighter her.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[sci.astro,sci.astro.seti] Welcome! - read this first [email protected] Astronomy Misc 9 February 2nd 06 01:37 AM
Teleportation knowledge analizer of the internet matirx! IT's a Roger wilco History 4 July 8th 05 06:11 PM
GRAVITATION AND QUANTUM MECHANICS GRAVITYMECHANIC2 Astronomy Misc 0 December 13th 04 03:17 AM
Breakthrough in Cosmology Kazmer Ujvarosy Amateur Astronomy 4 May 21st 04 11:44 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.