![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Pat Flannery" wrote in message ... Our Shuttle crews were also able to "dodge death on almost a monthly basis" due to the defective field joints on the SRBs and the shedding foam on the ET. And we are way ahead of Russia in space fatalities at 14 to 4 respectively. Stuffie? Is that you? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:19:32 GMT, "Jim Oberg" wrote:
Only with the Soviet program at a standstill did Moscow agree to fly a joint orbital mission. Its fallback position was that if it couldn't be Number One in space, it could at least pose as the equal partner of the new Number One, the United States. It was better than letting on how far behind its space program had fallen. Space history in a vacuum -- Some of the revisionist history touted at these celebrations wasn't nearly as benign. At the NASM, Vance Brand delicately described the cautious first meetings when "we'd all heard a lot of bad things about the other country". Brand wasn't so rude as to elaborate that the "bad things" Americans had heard about the USSR were mostly true and the "bad things" the Soviet public had been fed about the West were mostly propagandistic lies. But, Brand continued, since the cosmonauts were easy to get along with, "any concerns went away." As pilots they were able to ignore politics, they all agreed. I'm certainly not going to defend the morality of the USSR on any front. But you know, this wasn't exactly a high-water mark for the US either. We'd just lost what much of the world had come to feel was an imperialistic war in Vietnam. It had been revealed that we'd even fought a secret war in Cambodia. The prestige of the US government didn't exactly get a boost from Watergate. Our economy was a mess (did the Apollo crew wear "WIN" buttons in space? ![]() program was in the doldrums- Skylab hadn't exactly caught the public's imagination, especially since as first launched it looked like an injured duck in orbit. You seem to suggest that all was great here and we didn't need Apollo-Soyuz, but they did. That its primary purpose was as a Soviet propaganda exercise, and it had little beneficial effect on the mindset of the average (especially younger) citizen during some pretty dark days. I think there's a touch of revisionism in your article as well. But as someone who held an important place in the US space program, you get a hero's blank check from me as well ![]() Thanks, Dale |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Dale wrote: Our economy was a mess (did the Apollo crew wear "WIN" buttons in space? ![]() I may still have one of those lying around. For the young 'uns here who don't know what "WIN" button is, it was President Ford's laughable way of confronting inflation- if we all wore "Whip Inflation Now" buttons the thing would somehow go away. He was not reelected. Pat |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Dale wrote: I think there's a touch of revisionism in your article as well. I can guarantee you that's the first time I ever saw the loss of the Columbia blamed on the Russians. That hits me a a very odd conclusion to draw. Pat |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
OM wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 22:20:38 GMT, "Jim Oberg" wrote: I wouldn't call him a 'legend', because he flew too late to get the media attention, Q: did he fly as CMP on ASTP? A: Yes. Q: Then is he a legend? A: What the frack do *you* think? It's kinda like old-school British prog-rock. Everybody and their dog knows who Yes were, but you had to be _seriously_ into that stuff to know who 801 and Planet Gong were. Not huge stars, but awesome nonetheless. -- .. "Though I could not caution all, I yet may warn a few: Don't lend your hand to raise no flag atop no ship of fools!" --grateful dead. __________________________________________________ _____________ Mike Flugennock, flugennock at sinkers dot org "Mikey'zine": dubya dubya dubya dot sinkers dot org |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "mike flugennock" wrote in message ervers.com... Q: Then is he a legend? A: What the frack do *you* think? It's kinda like old-school British prog-rock. Everybody and their dog knows who Yes were, but you had to be _seriously_ into that stuff to know who 801 and Planet Gong were. Not huge stars, but awesome nonetheless. Gong were a great fusion band when Daevid Allen left. They were a pointless stoner space-rock band with him. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "mike flugennock" wrote in message ervers.com... OM wrote: On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 22:20:38 GMT, "Jim Oberg" wrote: I wouldn't call him a 'legend', because he flew too late to get the media attention, Q: did he fly as CMP on ASTP? A: Yes. Q: Then is he a legend? A: What the frack do *you* think? It's kinda like old-school British prog-rock. Everybody and their dog knows who Yes were, but you had to be _seriously_ into that stuff to know who 801 and Planet Gong were. Not huge stars, but awesome nonetheless. Of course I know who they are. I have a bunch of Gong, and other Daevid Allen projects, such as Soft Machine. Also nearly everything officially put out by Hawkwind. (I don't have the DVD re-releases for "Astounding Sounds/Amazing Music" and "Hawklords"). Also nearly everything by Brian Eno. Who would be another great choice for creative artist in space. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ami Silberman" wrote in message ... "mike flugennock" wrote in message ervers.com... It's kinda like old-school British prog-rock. Everybody and their dog knows who Yes were, but you had to be _seriously_ into that stuff to know who 801 and Planet Gong were. Not huge stars, but awesome nonetheless. Of course I know who they are. I have a bunch of Gong, and other Daevid Allen projects, such as Soft Machine. Also nearly everything officially put out by Hawkwind. (I don't have the DVD re-releases for "Astounding Sounds/Amazing Music" and "Hawklords"). Also nearly everything by Brian Eno. Who would be another great choice for creative artist in space. Brian Eno is already there, sort of ... as his music was used for the "For All Mankind" release directed by Al Reinert. Hmmm ... yeah, I'm in the mood for a Saturn V launch played back through 700 watts of surround sound system ... grin J |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"OM" wrote in message
... On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 22:20:38 GMT, "Jim Oberg" wrote: I wouldn't call him a 'legend', because he flew too late to get the media attention, Q: did he fly as CMP on ASTP? A: Yes. True - but if he hadn't been selected, there were several other people who could have trained to do it. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
JimO writings on shuttle disaster, recovery | Jim Oberg | Space Shuttle | 0 | July 11th 05 06:32 PM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 1 | March 2nd 05 04:35 PM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | February 4th 05 04:21 AM |
NASA Publications Online (V. long) | Andrew Gray | History | 4 | June 28th 04 10:24 PM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | April 2nd 04 12:01 AM |