![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Carlos said:
Let me ask you one last question: Do you really think you live in a free country? FYI. Canada isn't a free country. It is a socialist state just like most of Europe. Mr. RichA isn't an American. You are addressing a Canadian. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Coppy Littlehouse" wrote FYI. Canada isn't a free country. It is a socialist state just like most of Europe. Mr. RichA isn't an American. You are addressing a Canadian. Hi Miss Coppy Thanks for the information you gave me. Are you RichA girlfriend? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Carlo wrote:
Hi Miss Coppy Thanks for the information you gave me. Are you RichA girlfriend? Is this Euro gay-baiting that I'm witnessing? Astonishing. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Coppy:
Coppy Littlehouse wrote: Carlos said: Let me ask you one last question: Do you really think you live in a free country? FYI. Canada isn't a free country. It is a socialist state just like most of Europe. Mr. RichA isn't an American. You are addressing a Canadian. The USA is a mixed economy: a mixture of wealth producers and traders and, also, taxers, regulators, and controllers. Individual rights are going by the boards as well. A few keywords: * Janet Reno's resumes items. * The greater and greater use of government confiscations and condemnations at all levels by the rationalization of the Eminent Domain Clause. * Coercive taxation neatly endorsed by the Religious Conservative Right who really aren't economic conservatives. * Siphoning off the proceeds of the USPTO and placing them in the general funds of the USA, without getting rid of the applications backlog, or improving the backwards computer system. * Not defining any possibly rights for foreign citizens or war prisoners that are in the US. * Not providing a model constitution for Iraq or Afghanistan, * Not supporting Russia in the WTO, allthe while supporting the socialist dictatorship of the PRC. * Saying nothing about the atomic weapons of the PRC, and its satellite MIRV dispensing orbiters. * Not canceling the manned Mars mission. Not setting up a free enterprise and rights protected territory of the USA on the moon. * dealing with recompense for the descendants of Native Americans in the form of land ownership stock companies (such that I have written numerous times on Usenet. * Not creating a gold redeemable currency, and maintaining the paper money system of inflationary coercive taxation of US citizens. * Not selling off the socialist enterprises like NASA (except for its military components), AMTRAK, NPR, NIH, federal highways, and numerous other properties and businesses that are held in trust by the USA. * Not banning the use of fallacious arguments in all courts. * Not banning coerced attendance for juries, and also utilizing private voluntary means of screening and empaneling juries. * Banning all trade with tyrannies, e.g., with the world's most evil one, the PRC. That the USA's Conservatives chose to bolster trade with the PRC, an nation that does not allow individual rights or property rights (it provides priveledges and long therm leases). * Refusal to cause the PRC to respect intellectual property, to respect patents, and to cease knocking off USA products. * The USA committed coercive manipulation of the Florida Presidential vote, and that was exceedingly shameful. The Supreme Court of the USA can no longer be relied upon to protect the liberties of its citizens. * The USA Administration refuses to protect its citizens from those who would combine religion and state. ....... A longer list is possible. Coercion is far to acceptable to the Religious Conservatives. That they even promote coercion, makes them into liars. The USA is slipping ever faster into deceit, lies, socialism, tyranny. Ralph Hertle |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ralph Hertle" wrote in message ... * The USA Administration refuses to protect its citizens from those who would combine religion and state. Read some history sometime. Separation of church and state does not mean no religion in the state ! Their goal was to insure that there wouldn't be religious persecution. Now answer me this, why does our money, each and every last bit have the words "In God We Trust" on it ?? Think about this for a moment...................... Allan -- Only A Gentleman Can Insult Me And A True Gentleman Never Will |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Carlos" casaraiva@net... wrote in message ... Who begin to invade other countries to take political control of their government and their economy to make profits? etc. I'd sure like you to show me the profits we make off of said economies.. BTW, also show me where we invaded someone just to take control of their economies, and profits sometime. Could you please ? After this is America, not europe, which has a LONG history of doing exactly what you wrote !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (you must have been looking in the mirror when writing this) Don't confuse your countries sordid past with a truly free and economically viable country like America. We invade people who **** us off, not for the money.................... Allan -- Only A Gentleman Can Insult Me And A True Gentleman Never Will |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "AM" wrote in message news ![]() Don't confuse your countries sordid past with a truly free and economically viable country like America. You're joking, right? I don't know where America is but here in the USA everyone knows that the corporation rules over the individual: http://independent.org/newsroom/article.asp?id=1525 Nobody's free in a country where private corporations can steal homes from their owners just to build a mall. Greg |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() G.T. wrote: "AM" wrote in message news ![]() Don't confuse your countries sordid past with a truly free and economically viable country like America. You're joking, right? I don't know where America is but here in the USA everyone knows that the corporation rules over the individual: http://independent.org/newsroom/article.asp?id=1525 Nobody's free in a country where private corporations can steal homes from their owners just to build a mall. Greg G.T.: That's true about the malls. And the Supreme Court acted reprehensibly in not defending the rights and liberties of all its citizens. As a result anything goes, and its open season on your land. The slight against corporations doesn't hold water. Corporations are a great way of creating business concerns that function in a scope of activity that is possibly far larger than that possible to the individual. For example scientific research, creating medicines, and mining. Corporations are a great way of providing divisible ownership among many private individuals for large and small wealth creating industries. Ralph Hertle |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Celestron vs Celestron Pacific | Mean Mr Mustard | Amateur Astronomy | 31 | April 23rd 05 10:09 AM |
Orange Country Register: Celestron Down, Meade Sinking | RMOLLISE | Amateur Astronomy | 38 | April 6th 05 04:24 AM |
Brief Review of Celestron ED80 | Jason Martin | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | October 25th 04 11:54 PM |
Celestron settles with Meade | Edward | Amateur Astronomy | 24 | July 14th 04 08:48 PM |
Has anyone done a comparison of the Photon Instruments 127mm refractor with the Celestron and Meade 6" refractors? | Bob Midiri | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | December 6th 03 06:13 PM |