|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
What is or is not a paradox?
although Newton was the aboriginal decategorizer,
namely of Kepler's beautiful orbital constraints into "an equation of universal gravitation after the apple hit him on the head," it is an easy subsititution to show "curvature of Universe." KW... never be intimidated by they-the-them ganging up on you. thus: the mercury leaching from the tossed tubes is far more important than incidental exposure to UV, to folks who don't get enought sun, anyway; surely, it is not even comparable to the God-am beach, I say from youthful experience. thus: "room T q-devices," sounds like Copenhagenskooler puffery; chlorophyll is what it is, a haeme with the iron knocked-out by a magnesium. however, it may be indicative of some radiative phenomenon. through evolution, which could provide the inspiration for new types of room temperature quantum devices. thus: Lead and Violence quod erat demonstrandum cogito ergo sum summa cum laud, kids & cars?... I went to a seminar on the lead that is still out there, on the freeways, but I don't think that the professor had gotten out of his vehicular. of course, after I totalled the used car, I only use a bicycle. just don't use it to hold your booze! I think it is more to do with baby booms. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
What is or is not a paradox?
On Jan 10, 10:07 am, Mahipal wrote:
On Jan 3, 6:07 pm, Koobee Wublee wrote: paul andersen wrote: “Given two hypotheses where each is an antithesis to and thus invalidates the other, common sense says one must find experiments to validate only one of these hypotheses.” KW, you can never teach the willfully blind to see a rainbow. You are very correct. The little professor from Norway, paul andersen, thought that was a fumble and urged the sperm lover to haul it away. shrug The exact episode is like the children’s story “Blind men and the elephant”. Apparently, paul is too busy chasing chickens near the Arctic Circle that he lost the meaning of what scientific method is. Gee! You can even take hints from children’s story books. Ahahahaha... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blind_Men_and_the_Elephant Your argument are as lethal as always. You bet. shrug Only an idiot would write what Paul did. Now, you are getting the picture of how shallow-minded this person is. shrug For example, you proved me wrong when I in this paper: http://www.gethome.no/paulba/pdf/LTconsistent.pdf thought it was possible to set three clocks to zero at the instant when they were co-located: http://tinyurl.com/34dv5p8 On page 3 right below Figure 2, you have delta = (delta_A – blah blah blah) / sqrt(1 – B^2) Where ** B^2 = v^2 / c^2 That's my favorite equation of all time! Just love it. It is full of mathematical contradictions if one is smart enough to see where they are. shrug It can easily be Delta_A = (delta – blah blah blah) / sqrt(1 – B^2) The bottom line is the equation describing the segment of Minkowski spacetime using your labeling system: ** c^2 dt_AC^2 – ds_AC^2 = c^2 dt_BC^2 – ds_BC^2 Where ** ds^2 = dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2 The equation can be written as follows. ** dt_AC^2 (1 – B_AC^2) = dt_BC^2 (1 – B_BC^2) Where ** B_AC c = Speed of C as observed by A ** B_BC c = Speed of C as observed by B From A’s point of view trying to compare the rate of time flows with C, B and C are the same. Thus, the equation above simplifies into the following. ** dt_AB^2 (1 – B_AB^2) = dt_BB^2 (1 – B_BB^2) = dt_BB^2 Where ** B_AB c = Speed of B as observed by A ** B_BB c = 0 On the other hand, from C’s pint of view observing A, B and A are the same. Thus, the spacetime equation has to be interpreted differently as the following. ** dt_AA^2 (1 – B_AA^2) = dt_BA^2 (1 – B_BA^2) = dt_AA^2 Where ** B_AA c = 0 ** B_BA c = Speed of A as observed by B The only time when there is no paradox is when (B_AB = B_BA = 0). This is what the Lorentz symmetry is all about such that there is no special treatment on the one that is moving, and the little professor from Norway fails miserably on this one. SPANK SPANK SPANK It is time for paul to join another paul aka sylvia, absolute dick, little bitch, etc. better known as PD for another divine vision to resolve the paradox --- projection of proper time. Tom used to believe in that crap, but he is now back to the first divine vision promoted by promoted by Olivia Newton-John’s grandfather, Max Born. shrug Nice connection! ONJ and Born. "Have you never been mellow, have you never tried, to find the comfort, from inside..." try Dan Singh with QT's VV of Travolta fame. Sorry, I had one of those greasy free thought moments. Have you seen Koobee Wublee’s Relativity Play where Born was singing that same song? http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...37c8836abe60ac Actually KW, I was searching for your recent Zardoz reference, and instead, found beautiful Born Olivia. Still perusing threads... Zardoz was an interesting movie. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zardoz http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0070948 By far, the best part about that movie was Charlotte Rampling. shrug KW... never be intimidated by they-the-them ganging up on you. Thanks for the encouragement. No, Koobee Wublee would not be bullied by any of these idiots. shrug Best regards. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
What is or is not a paradox?
I think, he may have been being ironical, but
you'd have to ask him, since there was no attempt to quantumfy any thing. anywawy, if you persist with Newton's untheory of rocks o'light (and the screw-up of Snell's law of refraction), you will neever get any where- sville. Where minless (unitless) equations reside. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What is or is not a paradox? | Koobee Wublee | Astronomy Misc | 9 | January 2nd 13 04:41 PM |
The Cow Paradox | Keith Wood | SETI | 5 | December 30th 06 12:10 AM |
what if paradox | kjakja | Misc | 130 | December 12th 04 04:09 AM |