![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Paul Ciszek wrote: In article , Chris.B wrote: I was shocked when I took Venus transit images with a new Canon Ixus digital compact when the Sun came out as brown as hens eggs! My relatively ancient Sony makes the Sun pink. In both cases I used the same old, Baader foil, full aperture filter. Even further off topic, is it true that you can get a colored glass "hydrogen alpha" filter that does not cost thousands of dollars, but has a wider FWHM that the serious ones? You can get something like http://www.astronomik.com/en/photogr...cd-filter.html which costs a few hundred dollars and has a 12nm bandpass; or 50% more for a 6nm bandpass; they'll get you lovely pictures of hydrogen emission in the Milky Way and the Local Group but are no use for solar work. The cloudnights forum suggests that 1nm bandpass is absolutely the bare minimum for visual solar work. http://www.daystarfilters.com/Quantum.shtml are tunable etalon filters with down to 0.03nm bandpass, but price is roughly inversely proportional to bandpass. Tom |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() In article , Thomas Womack wrote: In article , Paul Ciszek wrote: Even further off topic, is it true that you can get a colored glass "hydrogen alpha" filter that does not cost thousands of dollars, but has a wider FWHM that the serious ones? You can get something like http://www.astronomik.com/en/photogr...cd-filter.html which costs a few hundred dollars and has a 12nm bandpass; or 50% more for a 6nm bandpass; they'll get you lovely pictures of hydrogen emission in the Milky Way and the Local Group but are no use for solar work. The cloudnights forum suggests that 1nm bandpass is absolutely the bare minimum for visual solar work. Well, I was thinking that a colored glass filter plus a suitable neutral density filter might get me more interesting results than just a mylar "neutral density" filter alone. My earlier picture was taken with a mylar filter, the green channel isolated to minimize chromatic aberration, and the contrast blown way up to show sunspot structure and granularity. If a 6nm BP filter can make the sunspots and granularity more noticable-- still requiring contrast enhancement, just not as much--that would be great. -- "Remember when teachers, public employees, Planned Parenthood, NPR and PBS crashed the stock market, wiped out half of our 401Ks, took trillions in TARP money, spilled oil in the Gulf of Mexico, gave themselves billions in bonuses, and paid no taxes? Yeah, me neither." |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2012-09-26, Paul Ciszek wrote:
Well, I was thinking that a colored glass filter plus a suitable neutral density filter might get me more interesting results than just a mylar "neutral density" filter alone. My earlier picture was taken with a mylar filter, the green channel isolated to minimize chromatic aberration, and the contrast blown way up to show sunspot structure and granularity. If a 6nm BP filter can make the sunspots and granularity more noticable-- still requiring contrast enhancement, just not as much--that would be great. The Baader Solar Continuum filter with a 10 nm pass band centered on 540 nm works pretty well to filter out of focus colors. The pass band is located at the wavelength where most achromatic telescopes are best corrected for spherical aberration. With one of those and a Herschel wedge plus an ND3.8 neutral density filter I get a sharp view visually. A Baader solar filter plus a Solar Continuum filter also works well for photography. I can't focus an SLR with the Herschel wedge because I don't have enough back focus. Bud |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2012-09-26, Paul Ciszek wrote:
Even further off topic, is it true that you can get a colored glass "hydrogen alpha" filter that does not cost thousands of dollars, but has a wider FWHM that the serious ones? Where would I find one? When I try to search for one, I just find fractional angstrom filters that cost more than my car did new. The problem there is that with a wider pass band the hydrogen alpha filters will not work to show any detail at that wavelength. You basically have just a deep red filter. The least expensive hydrogen alpha viewers I know about are the small Coronado PST and Lunt LS35T that cost about 600 US dollars. Bud |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 21, 12:39*am, (Paul Ciszek) wrote:
My camera has a choice of "white balance" settings. *If I use "Sunlight" on the assumption that the moon is a sunlight landscape, photos of the moon come out looking a little brownish. *If I use "Auto", the moon appears nearly colorless. *The former coloration is not implausible, but which is closer to the truth? Fortunately, I can make this decision retroactively for photos shot in RAW mode. -- "Remember when teachers, public employees, Planned Parenthood, NPR and PBS crashed the stock market, wiped out half of our 401Ks, took trillions in TARP money, spilled oil in the Gulf of Mexico, gave themselves billions in bonuses, and paid no taxes? Yeah, me neither." How exactly did our naked and physically dark moon become so unusually monochromatic, reflective and inert? The moon is not actually monochromatic nor inert: Moon’s natural surface colors are those of all the perfectly natural minerals as they unavoidably react to the visible and UV spectrum, as only better viewed with having their natural color/hue saturation cranked up, as otherwise there’s no false or artificial colors added. http://spaceweather.com/submissions/...1346444660.jpg http://www.spaceweather.com/swpod200...4dnmol44vuaf43 Oddly the NASA/Apollo era and their rad-hard Kodak version of our physically dark and paramagnetic moon is apparently the one and only off-world location that becomes more inert as well as more reflective and monochromatic by the closer you get to it, and any planet other than Earth simply can’t be recorded within the same FOV as having the horizon of that naked moon (regardless of the FOV direction or use of any given lens, as well as not even possible when using the world’s best film and optics along with a polarized optical filter to reduce the local surface glare doesn’t seem to help). http://groups.google.com/groups/search http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth,Brad_Guth,Brad.Guth,BradGuth,BG,Guth Usenet/”Guth Venus” |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PLANET SELENE -- Imagenation, Moon of Color... by the starswirler | Painius | Misc | 0 | November 18th 06 05:11 PM |
Moon rise color - blue? | Canopus | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | September 13th 04 06:19 PM |
MWBR 2.71 K linked to color Color of the Universe is silverywhite like the element plutonium (JohnsHopkins) | Archimedes Plutonium | Astronomy Misc | 3 | March 25th 04 07:17 AM |
Color Moon mosaics | Norbert | UK Astronomy | 11 | February 17th 04 07:19 PM |
Color Moon mosaics | Norbert | Amateur Astronomy | 14 | February 15th 04 08:53 PM |