A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Progress fails to dock with ISS



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 2nd 10, 07:37 PM posted to sci.space.history,sci.space.policy
Rick Jones[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 587
Default Progress fails to dock with ISS

In sci.space.history Pat Flannery wrote:
The Progress 38 cargo spacecraft suffered a communications failure and
flew past the ISS earlier today rather than docking with it:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38060650...science-space/


Space.com's article claims it "veered out of control"

They are also mentioning how Progress 37 had to be docked manually.

What is the antonym for progress?-)

rick jones
--
firebug n, the idiot who tosses a lit cigarette out his car window
these opinions are mine, all mine; HP might not want them anyway...
feel free to post, OR email to rick.jones2 in hp.com but NOT BOTH...
  #2  
Old July 2nd 10, 09:07 PM posted to sci.space.history,sci.space.policy
snidely
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,303
Default Progress fails to dock with ISS

On Jul 2, 11:37*am, Rick Jones wrote:
In sci.space.history Pat Flannery wrote:

The Progress 38 cargo spacecraft suffered a communications failure and
flew past the ISS earlier today rather than docking with it:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38060650...science-space/


Space.com's article claims it "veered out of control" *

They are also mentioning how Progress 37 had to be docked manually.


Google News now let's you add your own sections, so I put in a "Space"
section, and this story was right there at the top. Close behind is
stuff about adding space to Cobo Center in Detroit.

/dps "all your cadets are belong to us"
  #3  
Old July 2nd 10, 09:52 PM posted to sci.space.history,sci.space.policy
Pat Flannery
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18,465
Default Progress fails to dock with ISS

The Progress 38 cargo spacecraft suffered a communications failure and
flew past the ISS earlier today rather than docking with it:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38060650...science-space/
I suspect Trotskyite Wreckers are responsible, but Glenn Beck thinks it
is the work of Marxist Progressives.
Come to think of it, Trotskyite Wreckers and Marxist Progressives might
be the same thing.
Courage, comrades!

Pat
  #4  
Old July 2nd 10, 11:46 PM posted to sci.space.history,sci.space.policy
Rick Jones[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 587
Default Progress fails to dock with ISS

In sci.space.history Pat Flannery wrote:
On 7/2/2010 10:37 AM, Rick Jones wrote:
Space.com's article claims it "veered out of control"


It's now apparently drifting away from the station while slowly
spinning.


Not unlike Frank Poole?-)

Oh joy - so it is on the verge of being a big honking peice of space
junk. With an orbit not far from that of the ISS.

rick jones
--
oxymoron n, commuter in a gas-guzzling luxury SUV with an American flag
these opinions are mine, all mine; HP might not want them anyway...
feel free to post, OR email to rick.jones2 in hp.com but NOT BOTH...
  #5  
Old July 2nd 10, 11:51 PM posted to sci.space.history,sci.space.policy
Rick Jones[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 587
Default Progress fails to dock with ISS

I have to wonder if there are some Congresscritters from the likes of
FL and LA and perhaps UT who are hoping Progress 38 cannot dock to the
ISS and they can use that for a reason to further extend Shuttle.

Perhaps the Counterrevolutionary Hooligans of which Pat speaks were a
group of Congressional aides on a junket to a Russian Cosmodrome?-)

rick jones
--
oxymoron n, commuter in a gas-guzzling luxury SUV with an American flag
these opinions are mine, all mine; HP might not want them anyway...
feel free to post, OR email to rick.jones2 in hp.com but NOT BOTH...
  #6  
Old July 3rd 10, 02:25 AM posted to sci.space.history,sci.space.policy
Pat Flannery
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18,465
Default Progress fails to dock with ISS

On 7/2/2010 10:37 AM, Rick Jones wrote:


Space.com's article claims it "veered out of control"


It's now apparently drifting away from the station while slowly spinning.

They are also mentioning how Progress 37 had to be docked manually.

What is the antonym for progress?-)


Counterrevolutionary hooliganism.
That may explain the slow spinning - it has lost its bearing on the True
Red Path and is engaging in deviationism by counter-revolving.

Pat
  #7  
Old July 3rd 10, 02:27 AM posted to sci.space.history,sci.space.policy
Pat Flannery
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18,465
Default Progress fails to dock with ISS

On 7/2/2010 12:07 PM, snidely wrote:


Google News now let's you add your own sections, so I put in a "Space"
section, and this story was right there at the top.


You do realize that Google is going to use that data on what you are
interested in to better target you for advertising, don't you?

Pat
  #8  
Old July 3rd 10, 03:01 AM posted to sci.space.history,sci.space.policy
Pat Flannery
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18,465
Default Progress fails to dock with ISS

On 7/2/2010 10:37 AM, Rick Jones wrote:

Space.com's article claims it "veered out of control"


Newest update is that they are going to attempt to figure out what went
wrong and get it back under control overnight and tomorrow, setting up
for a docking around noon EDT on July 4th.
Let us hope we do not see any fireworks then, and that the spacecraft's
hooliganism has been fully eradicated from it by the time it docks:
http://spaceflightnow.com/station/ex...02progress38p/
Let Socialism Be Your Guide!

Pat
  #9  
Old July 3rd 10, 03:38 AM posted to sci.space.history,sci.space.policy
Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)[_1066_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default Progress fails to dock with ISS

Pat Flannery wrote:
The Progress 38 cargo spacecraft suffered a communications failure and
flew past the ISS earlier today rather than docking with it:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38060650...science-space/
I suspect Trotskyite Wreckers are responsible, but Glenn Beck thinks
it is the work of Marxist Progressives.
Come to think of it, Trotskyite Wreckers and Marxist Progressives
might be the same thing.
Courage, comrades!



The real question is where is Jim Oberg.

--
Greg Moore
Ask me about lily, an RPI based CMC.


  #10  
Old July 3rd 10, 03:48 AM posted to sci.space.history,sci.space.policy
Scott Stevenson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 67
Default Progress fails to dock with ISS

On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 18:37:51 +0000 (UTC), Rick Jones
wrote:

In sci.space.history Pat Flannery wrote:
The Progress 38 cargo spacecraft suffered a communications failure and
flew past the ISS earlier today rather than docking with it:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38060650...science-space/


Space.com's article claims it "veered out of control"

They are also mentioning how Progress 37 had to be docked manually.

What is the antonym for progress?-)


That would be Congress...

take care,
Scott
Hey, somebody had to say it
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
could soyuz dock with shuttle? Bob Haller Space Shuttle 1 August 13th 05 10:17 PM
Can 2 Shuttles dock to ISS at once? Explorer8939 Space Station 25 October 30th 03 08:25 AM
Can two Shuttles dock together Explorer8939 Space Shuttle 5 August 25th 03 01:05 AM
Space Dock - ISS Chris Bennetts Technology 0 July 2nd 03 02:07 AM
Space Dock - ISS Chris Bennetts Policy 0 July 2nd 03 02:07 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.