Saturday, June 27, 2009 . Lectu Neutrino Lesson for Dissidents.

Saturday, June 27, 2009 . Lectu Neutrino Lesson for Dissidents.

/ by David de Hilster /

http://www.worldnpa.org/pdf/events/FriendlyLetter.pdf
/ World Science Database. /
================================= .

My opinion.
1.
Trying to save $B!F(B The law of conservation and transformation energy $B!F(B
Wolfgang Pauli discover ( theorized) neutrino $B!F(Bon the end of his
pen.$B!G(B
2.
According to QED Electron has infinity energy in interaction
with vacuum: E= $B!g(B.
But according to $B!F(B The law of conservation
and transformation energy $B!F(B it is impossible.
3.
So. How to understand this situation?
What does $B!G(B The law of conservation and transformation energy/ mass$B!G(B
mean according to one single electron or photon or neutrino ?
======= .
P.S.
#
Robert Milliken in his Nobel speech ( 1923) told, that he knew
nothing about the $B!F(Blast essence of electron $B!F(B.
#
You know, it would be sufficient to really understand the electron.
/ Albert Einstein./
#
Tell me what an electron is and I'll then tell you everything.
/ From an article./
#
All these fifty years of conscious brooding have brought me
no nearer to the answer to the question, ' What are light quanta?'
Nowadays every Tom, Dick and Harry thinks he knows it,
but he is mistaken.
( Albert Einstein, 1954)

The same Einstein$B!G(Bs words is possible to say about electron.
#
More than ten different models of the electron are presented here.
(!!!)
More than twenty models are discussed briefly. (!!!)
Thus, the book gives a complete picture of contemporary theoretical
thinking (traditional and new) about the physics of the electron.

/ book $B!F(B What is the Electron? $B!F(B
Volodimir Simulik
Montreal, Canada. 2005. /
http://redshift.vif.com/BookBlurbs/Electron.htm

And it is possible to find 100 more models of electron in the
internet.
============== .
So. My conclusion.
1.
The neutrino problem was raised from the wish to keep (preserve !)
$B!F(B The law of conservation and transformation energy/ mass$B!G(B.
2.
We don$B!G(Bt know what electron and photon are and therefore
we don$B!G(Bt know what neutrino is.
3.
In my opinion the discussion about neutrino, photon, electron
and others micro particles must be connected with
$B!F(B The law of conservation and transformation energy/ mass$B!G(B.
Without this connection every dispute is tautology.
====== .
Best wishes.
Israel Sadovnik. / Socratus.

http://www.worldnpa.org/php2/index.p...isplay&id=1372
===================== . .

Electrons are kinks in the fabric of space-time. When the universe
cooled and the higher dimensions condensed out of existence, some
transient twists can permanently locked into place. It's like tying a
knot in a ribbon and then gluing the end of the ribbons together; when
the ends of the ribbon were free to move in three-space, but become
locked into place in two-space. The knot can be moved along the
ribbon, but it cannot be untied. All particles are based around these
kinks.

The conservation of mass-energy follow immediately from this: the
kinks moved around the universe, but at the current temperatures, they
cannot be removed.

On Jun 27, 9:32 pm, socratus wrote:
Saturday, June 27, 2009 . Lectu Neutrino Lesson for Dissidents.

/ by David de Hilster /

http://www.worldnpa.org/pdf/events/FriendlyLetter.pdf
/ World Science Database. /
================================= .

My opinion.
1.
Trying to save ' The law of conservation and transformation energy '
Wolfgang Pauli discover ( theorized) neutrino 'on the end of his
pen.'
2.
According to QED Electron has infinity energy in interaction
with vacuum: E= $B!g(B.
But according to ' The law of conservation
and transformation energy ' it is impossible.
3.
So. How to understand this situation?
What does ' The law of conservation and transformation energy/ mass'
mean according to one single electron or photon or neutrino ?
======= .
P.S.
#
Robert Milliken in his Nobel speech ( 1923) told, that he knew
nothing about the 'last essence of electron '.
#
You know, it would be sufficient to really understand the electron.
/ Albert Einstein./
#
Tell me what an electron is and I'll then tell you everything.
/ From an article./
#
All these fifty years of conscious brooding have brought me
no nearer to the answer to the question, ' What are light quanta?'
Nowadays every Tom, Dick and Harry thinks he knows it,
but he is mistaken.
( Albert Einstein, 1954)

The same Einstein's words is possible to say about electron.
#
More than ten different models of the electron are presented here.
(!!!)
More than twenty models are discussed briefly. (!!!)
Thus, the book gives a complete picture of contemporary theoretical
thinking (traditional and new) about the physics of the electron.

/ book ' What is the Electron? '
Volodimir Simulik
Montreal, Canada. 2005. /http://redshift.vif.com/BookBlurbs/Electron.htm

And it is possible to find 100 more models of electron in the
internet.
============== .
So. My conclusion.
1.
The neutrino problem was raised from the wish to keep (preserve !)
' The law of conservation and transformation energy/ mass'.
2.
We don't know what electron and photon are and therefore
we don't know what neutrino is.
3.
In my opinion the discussion about neutrino, photon, electron
and others micro particles must be connected with
' The law of conservation and transformation energy/ mass'.
Without this connection every dispute is tautology.
====== .
Best wishes.
Israel Sadovnik. / Socratus.

http://www.worldnpa.org/php2/index.p...tab1=Display&i...
===================== . .

On Jun 28, 10:25 pm, Six of Nine or Half-dozen of the Oher
wrote:
Electrons are kinks in the fabric of space-time. When the universe
cooled and the higher dimensions condensed out of existence, some
transient twists can permanently locked into place. It's like tying a
knot in a ribbon and then gluing the end of the ribbons together; when
the ends of the ribbon were free to move in three-space, but become
locked into place in two-space. The knot can be moved along the
ribbon, but it cannot be untied. All particles are based around these
kinks.

The conservation of mass-energy follow immediately from this: the
kinks moved around the universe, but at the current temperatures, they
cannot be removed.

On Jun 27, 9:32 pm, socratus wrote:



Saturday, June 27, 2009 . Lectu Neutrino Lesson for Dissidents.

/ by David de Hilster /

http://www.worldnpa.org/pdf/events/FriendlyLetter.pdf
/ World Science Database. /
================================= .

My opinion.
1.
Trying to save ' The law of conservation and transformation energy '
Wolfgang Pauli discover ( theorized) neutrino 'on the end of his
pen.'
2.
According to QED Electron has infinity energy in interaction
with vacuum: E= $B!g(B.
But according to ' The law of conservation
and transformation energy ' it is impossible.
3.
So. How to understand this situation?
What does ' The law of conservation and transformation energy/ mass'
mean according to one single electron or photon or neutrino ?
======= .
P.S.
#
Robert Milliken in his Nobel speech ( 1923) told, that he knew
nothing about the 'last essence of electron '.
#
You know, it would be sufficient to really understand the electron.
/ Albert Einstein./
#
Tell me what an electron is and I'll then tell you everything.
/ From an article./
#
All these fifty years of conscious brooding have brought me
no nearer to the answer to the question, ' What are light quanta?'
Nowadays every Tom, Dick and Harry thinks he knows it,
but he is mistaken.
( Albert Einstein, 1954)

The same Einstein's words is possible to say about electron.
#
More than ten different models of the electron are presented here.
(!!!)
More than twenty models are discussed briefly. (!!!)
Thus, the book gives a complete picture of contemporary theoretical
thinking (traditional and new) about the physics of the electron.

/ book ' What is the Electron? '
Volodimir Simulik
Montreal, Canada. 2005. /http://redshift.vif.com/BookBlurbs/Electron.htm

And it is possible to find 100 more models of electron in the
internet.
============== .
So. My conclusion.
1.
The neutrino problem was raised from the wish to keep (preserve !)
' The law of conservation and transformation energy/ mass'.
2.
We don't know what electron and photon are and therefore
we don't know what neutrino is.
3.
In my opinion the discussion about neutrino, photon, electron
and others micro particles must be connected with
' The law of conservation and transformation energy/ mass'.
Without this connection every dispute is tautology.
====== .
Best wishes.
Israel Sadovnik. / Socratus.

http://www.worldnpa.org/php2/index.p...tab1=Display&i...
===================== . .- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

================
Nice explanation .
Now we can easy to understand the electrons / kinks behaviour.

On Jun 28, 12:25 pm, Six of Nine or Half-dozen of the Oher
wrote:
Electrons are kinks in the fabric of space-time. When the universe
cooled and the higher dimensions condensed out of existence, some
transient twists can permanently locked into place. It's like tying a
knot in a ribbon and then gluing the end of the ribbons together; when
the ends of the ribbon were free to move in three-space, but become
locked into place in two-space. The knot can be moved along the
ribbon, but it cannot be untied. All particles are based around these
kinks.

The conservation of mass-energy follow immediately from this: the
kinks moved around the universe, but at the current temperatures, they
cannot be removed.

On Jun 27, 9:32 pm, socratus wrote:


So does each electron have a positron at the other end of its ribbon?

Double-A

P.S. Why does everybody have to top post?


Saturday, June 27, 2009 . Lectu Neutrino Lesson for Dissidents.

/ by David de Hilster /

http://www.worldnpa.org/pdf/events/FriendlyLetter.pdf
/ World Science Database. /
================================= .

My opinion.
1.
Trying to save ' The law of conservation and transformation energy '
Wolfgang Pauli discover ( theorized) neutrino 'on the end of his
pen.'
2.
According to QED Electron has infinity energy in interaction
with vacuum: E= $B!g(B.
But according to ' The law of conservation
and transformation energy ' it is impossible.
3.
So. How to understand this situation?
What does ' The law of conservation and transformation energy/ mass'
mean according to one single electron or photon or neutrino ?
======= .
P.S.
#
Robert Milliken in his Nobel speech ( 1923) told, that he knew
nothing about the 'last essence of electron '.
#
You know, it would be sufficient to really understand the electron.
/ Albert Einstein./
#
Tell me what an electron is and I'll then tell you everything.
/ From an article./
#
All these fifty years of conscious brooding have brought me
no nearer to the answer to the question, ' What are light quanta?'
Nowadays every Tom, Dick and Harry thinks he knows it,
but he is mistaken.
( Albert Einstein, 1954)

The same Einstein's words is possible to say about electron.
#
More than ten different models of the electron are presented here.
(!!!)
More than twenty models are discussed briefly. (!!!)
Thus, the book gives a complete picture of contemporary theoretical
thinking (traditional and new) about the physics of the electron.

/ book ' What is the Electron? '
Volodimir Simulik
Montreal, Canada. 2005. /http://redshift.vif.com/BookBlurbs/Electron.htm

And it is possible to find 100 more models of electron in the
internet.
============== .
So. My conclusion.
1.
The neutrino problem was raised from the wish to keep (preserve !)
' The law of conservation and transformation energy/ mass'.
2.
We don't know what electron and photon are and therefore
we don't know what neutrino is.
3.
In my opinion the discussion about neutrino, photon, electron
and others micro particles must be connected with
' The law of conservation and transformation energy/ mass'.
Without this connection every dispute is tautology.
====== .
Best wishes.
Israel Sadovnik. / Socratus.

http://www.worldnpa.org/php2/index.p...tab1=Display&i...
===================== . .

Multiple dimensions were lost, so the kinks are more than just left
handed vs right handed. Also they are not symmetrically distributed;
they were random transients when they were frozen into place.

On Jun 28, 1:42 pm, Double-A wrote:
On Jun 28, 12:25 pm, Six of Nine or Half-dozen of the Oher

wrote:
Electrons are kinks in the fabric of space-time. When the universe
cooled and the higher dimensions condensed out of existence, some
transient twists can permanently locked into place. It's like tying a
knot in a ribbon and then gluing the end of the ribbons together; when
the ends of the ribbon were free to move in three-space, but become
locked into place in two-space. The knot can be moved along the
ribbon, but it cannot be untied. All particles are based around these
kinks.

The conservation of mass-energy follow immediately from this: the
kinks moved around the universe, but at the current temperatures, they
cannot be removed.

On Jun 27, 9:32 pm, socratus wrote:

So does each electron have a positron at the other end of its ribbon?

Double-A

P.S. Why does everybody have to top post?

Saturday, June 27, 2009 . Lectu Neutrino Lesson for Dissidents.

/ by David de Hilster /

http://www.worldnpa.org/pdf/events/FriendlyLetter.pdf
/ World Science Database. /
================================= .

My opinion.
1.
Trying to save ' The law of conservation and transformation energy '
Wolfgang Pauli discover ( theorized) neutrino 'on the end of his
pen.'
2.
According to QED Electron has infinity energy in interaction
with vacuum: E= $B!g(B.
But according to ' The law of conservation
and transformation energy ' it is impossible.
3.
So. How to understand this situation?
What does ' The law of conservation and transformation energy/ mass'
mean according to one single electron or photon or neutrino ?
======= .
P.S.
#
Robert Milliken in his Nobel speech ( 1923) told, that he knew
nothing about the 'last essence of electron '.
#
You know, it would be sufficient to really understand the electron.
/ Albert Einstein./
#
Tell me what an electron is and I'll then tell you everything.
/ From an article./
#
All these fifty years of conscious brooding have brought me
no nearer to the answer to the question, ' What are light quanta?'
Nowadays every Tom, Dick and Harry thinks he knows it,
but he is mistaken.
( Albert Einstein, 1954)

The same Einstein's words is possible to say about electron.
#
More than ten different models of the electron are presented here.
(!!!)
More than twenty models are discussed briefly. (!!!)
Thus, the book gives a complete picture of contemporary theoretical
thinking (traditional and new) about the physics of the electron.

/ book ' What is the Electron? '
Volodimir Simulik
Montreal, Canada. 2005. /http://redshift.vif.com/BookBlurbs/Electron.htm

And it is possible to find 100 more models of electron in the
internet.
============== .
So. My conclusion.
1.
The neutrino problem was raised from the wish to keep (preserve !)
' The law of conservation and transformation energy/ mass'.
2.
We don't know what electron and photon are and therefore
we don't know what neutrino is.
3.
In my opinion the discussion about neutrino, photon, electron
and others micro particles must be connected with
' The law of conservation and transformation energy/ mass'.
Without this connection every dispute is tautology.
====== .
Best wishes.
Israel Sadovnik. / Socratus.

http://www.worldnpa.org/php2/index.p...tab1=Display&i...
===================== . .