![]() |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jeff Findley" wrote in message ... An even better example might be in air refueling. The human workload there is pretty high. You've got at least two pilots and a boom operator who all have to be "on their toes" during the entire operation. That's a really hard task to automate. I'm not sure if it's ever been done in an automated or teleoperated fashion. I wonder if the USAF has experimented with in air refueling of UAV's... Looks like this has been done as a research program: http://www.air-attack.com/news/news_...apability.html Makes me wonder how much work is left before this sort of capability could be deployed in the field. Imagine UAV's that only have to land for maintenance. Cool. Jeff -- "Many things that were acceptable in 1958 are no longer acceptable today. My own standards have changed too." -- Freeman Dyson |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
James Webb space telescope; Risky venture? | RichA | Amateur Astronomy | 4 | March 23rd 05 06:58 PM |
risky path for cassini probe? | simon.coombs3 | UK Astronomy | 13 | July 4th 04 10:38 PM |
Is a Space Elevator more risky than the shuttle? | Henry J. Cobb | Space Science Misc | 18 | October 4th 03 02:06 AM |
Last ship in Mars-bound armada begins risky trip | cndc | Space Shuttle | 3 | July 9th 03 04:06 AM |