![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 6, 12:27*pm, Pentcho Valev wrote:
On Aug 6, 6:56*pm, PD wrote: There is never "too far". Nature is what it is, as shown in experiment. If nature is very, very strange, then that's what it is. You are Absolutely Correct again, Clever Draper. For instance nature says, through the Pound-Rebka experiment, that the gravitational frequency shift is: f' = f(1 + V/c^2) and that's what it is isn't it Clever Draper. On the other hand Divine Albert gives two equations for the variation of the speed of light in a gravitational field: (A) c' = c(1 + V/c^2) (B) c' = c(1 + 2V/c^2) Which equation Clever Draper - (A) or (B) - is consistent with the gravitational frequency shift equation? Is the inconsistent one wrong? Einstein zombie world is constantly singing "Divine Einstein" and does not give a **** about both (A) and (B) *but I have the impression that you are not a typical zombie and CAN answer the questions. So? So, what's the deal, Pentcho? Are you asking me to try and teach you so that it DOES make sense to you? Are you asking me to help you reconcile your common sense to what nature really does? Are you trying to get a free education on the internet? PD |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A dark future for cosmology | oldcoot | Misc | 17 | January 14th 08 01:41 PM |
A dark future for cosmology | oldcoot | Misc | 12 | December 31st 07 10:27 AM |
A dark future for cosmology | oldcoot | Misc | 0 | December 29th 07 01:37 PM |
Dark matter, cosmology, etc. | Robin Bignall | UK Astronomy | 6 | March 21st 05 02:28 PM |