![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() At the risk of uttering complete nonsense, I'd like to describe something I've been wondering about for a while, namely whether the density of light in the universe might be related to the problem of dark matter and dark energy. If one takes all of the light in the universe, it has a certain mass and therefore it exerts a certain gravitational force on the matter in the universe. I don't know how much that force is taken into account in computations of the rate of expansion of the universe. For example, what is the total gravitational attraction exerted by the light from the cosmic background radiation? I realize that dark matter is only supposed to interact gravitationally with the other stuff we know about in the universe, whereas light interacts electromagnetically and maybe in other ways, but if the light is of sufficiently low frequency, I think it wouldn't interact in any way with matter except gravitationally. Conceivably, there is a lot of light of much lower frequency than the cosmic background radiation and we can't detect it except gravitationally and, since it is uniformly distributed throughout the universe, its primary manifestation has been through its effects as dark matter. For example, if the light had a wavelength larger than the solar system, we would have no direct way to sample it with any detector we could construct. Since it would not interact electromagnetically, strongly, weakly, etc. with matter, we could naturally ask what process could produce light of such low frequency. One way would be for it to be doppler shifted from light of greater frequency as the universe expands. The notion of dark energy has been offered to explain recent evidence for the accelerated expansion of the universe. One other property of light, at least in Gaussian beams, is its tendency to spread out. So, maybe that tendency to spread out when it is already densely distributed also contributes to the accelerated expansion of the universe. I guess I am saying something like the following: light's tendency to spread out contributes to the accelerated expansion of the universe; that is what people have attributed to dark energy. As the expansion proceeds, the light gets doppler shifted so far down that it can't interact with matter other than gravitationally. The manifestation of that gravitational interaction is what people have attributed to dark matter. This is pure speculation and not well informed. I don't expect any of it to be right. If someone can explain why it is all wrong, that will help me forget about it and move on to something else. Maybe a few relevant numbers are all it takes. I don't intend to argue about it: I'd just like to hear people's opinions and try to learn from them. If someone already came up with this crackpot idea and published it, perhaps someone can provide a reference to it and its refutation. Ignorantly, Allan Adler ************************************************** ************************** * * * Disclaimer: I am a guest and *not* a member of the MIT Artificial * * Intelligence Lab. My actions and comments do not reflect * * in any way on MIT. Moreover, I am nowhere near the Boston * * metropolitan area. * * * ************************************************** ************************** |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Dark matter | Gordon D. Pusch | Science | 4 | April 28th 04 06:56 AM |
Galaxies without dark matter halos? | greywolf42 | Astronomy Misc | 34 | November 5th 03 12:34 PM |
A Detailed Map of Dark Matter in a Galactic Cluster Reveals How Giant Cosmic Structures Formed | Ron Baalke | Astronomy Misc | 3 | August 5th 03 02:16 PM |
Detecting dark matter | Stuart Levy | Astronomy Misc | 14 | July 23rd 03 02:09 AM |
U.California-Irvine study finds dark matter is for superWIMPs (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | July 14th 03 09:02 PM |