![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Anomalous Acceleration of Pioneer 10 toward the sun of
about 10^-8cm/sec^2 at various distances r from the sun can be associated with the fact that the velocity of the spacecraft is greater than the orbital velocity the spacecraft would have in a circular orbit at the same distance. A rationale for this coincidence is given below. The speed of the craft,now 12km/sec according to Pioneer home page was about 36.67km/sec as it passed Jupiter while 29km per sec relative to the sun when it was on earth orbiting the sun. If the spacecraft was in orbit around the sun at a distance r from the sun it would have an orbital velocity of v from GM/r^2=v^2/r So its orbital velocity at a distance r can be compared to its actual velocity v*_r compared to v_r. The hypothesis is proposed that the mass of objects is proportional to the total number of protons and neutrons in the object and to the transverse speed of the object wrt its attractive center eg the center of the earth for objects on the earth or in orbit around the earth, and the sun, for planets and other objects like the spacecraft beyond the earth's orbit. The Pioneer 10 spacecraft is moving almost completely radially away from the sun such that the sine of the angle between its trajectory and a radial line to the sun is very small eg .001. The spacecraft is also free to rotate. According to this hypothesis there would be change in the attraction of the spacecraft to the sun proportional to the difference between (GM/r)^1/2 and v*_r. If r=10^12 then ((6.67)(10^-11)(1.99)(10^30)/(10^12))^1/2=3.66(10^3.5)=11.57km/se c about and the speed of the craft was probably more. The attractive mass of an object on the earth directed to the center of the earth is assumed to be due to electrostatic dipole inside protons and neutrons of length 10^-18 meters so that (6.67)(10^-11) times [(1.67)(10^-27)]^2 = (9)(10^9)(es)^2 if s=(.9)(10-18) is the gravitational force between two protons one meter apart represented as the force between two electrostatic dipoles one meter part and colinearly and attractively oriented. And so the gravitational force between the sun and the earth could be written as the force between radially oriented dipoles: GmM/R^2 = 9(10^9)mM[6.02)(10^26)]^2 times kK times s*S* times (2.56) times 10-38 divided by R^2 where the dipoles are es* and eS* and e=1.6(10^-19)Coul.;this implies kKs*S*= (.0079)10^(-61-11+38) = 10^-36 approximatelySince the Sun is .75H+.25He so that 1.75kg of Sun contains 6.02 times 10^26 molecules each of which contains on average 1.75 protons+neutrons so 1kg of the gaseous Sun contains 6.02 times 10^26 protons+neutrons in a volume that is larger of course than that of 1 kg of a solid planet; but 1kg of any planet or the Sun contains the same number of protons+neutrons. There are about 2(10^30) kg in the Sun. Hence the Sun contains 6.02 times 10^26 times M or 12 times 10^56 and the Earth contains 6.02 times 10^26 times m or 3.59 times 10^51 unit dipoles in the Earth. The total dipoles a 1.2(10^57)k(s)RS* and 3.59(10^51)K(S)Rs*. Hence . Now RkS* and RKs* are the magnitudes of the dipoles associated with the Sun and planet respectively where R varies from around 1.5(10^11)meters 10^10 to 10^13 meters. But we also know that the Earth's dipoles cannot be much larger than atomic nuclei about 10^-15meters =RKs* that Ks*=10^-26 which implies kS*=10^-10 and also RkS*= 10^(-10+11) so the dipoles on the Sun are 10 meters in length or the amount of charge in each dipole is more than e=^-19 etc. We assume, following the Wilson Bartlett relation between angular momentum and gravity, that dipoles in protons and neutrons on planets that produce their attraction to the sun is due to the orbital speed of the planets and so a part of the planet, like the spacecraft, when moving apart from the planet at a different speed will have its dipoles change and so its attractive mass will change. see http://www.bestweb.net/~sansbury |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pioneer Saturn (aka Pioneer 11) Encounter Trajectory - Question. | Ian R | History | 4 | December 4th 03 10:26 PM |
Pioneer 10 Update - December 3, 2003 | Ron Baalke | History | 0 | December 3rd 03 04:49 PM |
"Pioneer anomalous acceleration" and Cassini | Jonathan Silverlight | Astronomy Misc | 49 | November 18th 03 07:37 PM |