![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
From the book "The Riddle of Gravity" by Einstein's colleague at
Princeton, Peter G. Bergmann: "The advance of the perihelion of Mercury was considered a settled matter in 1915 when Einstein derived from hs thoery ... " "The excellence of this zgreement has been called into question by Dicke" (Robert H. Dicke of Princeton). "According to Dicke, the scaler-tensor theory leads to a slightly different rate of perihelion advance than Einstein's original theory, the difference amounting to about one tenth of Einstein's value." WHOOPS! The book goes on to say that possible oblateness of the Sun might be responsible for part of Mercury's perihelion advance. Studies have been done, but with no conclusiive results. This just goes to show that nothing is nailed down, as the textbook bangers would say. I still like to pin my hopes on the exixtence of Vulcan as a partial explanation. There is no one better poised to discover Vulcan than David Tholen in his current survey of objects inside of Mercury's orbit. He might be the first in 100 years to view Vulcan as it comes out of the glare of the Sun! And that will prove it is not an invisible planet as the astrologers claim. (Though it would be interesting if they were right and it turns out to be a dark matter planet!) Live long and prosper, Dave! Double-A |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Perihelion of Mercury question | Sorcerer | Astronomy Misc | 13 | January 6th 07 09:24 PM |
Perihelion of Mercury question | Sorcerer | Astronomy Misc | 114 | January 1st 07 11:36 PM |
Eris at perihelion | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | December 4th 06 09:07 PM |
Perihelion of Mercury with classical mechanics ? | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 34 | April 28th 05 06:57 PM |
Perihelion Puzzle | OG | UK Astronomy | 3 | January 6th 04 12:17 AM |