![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() The Big Bang, the Scientific Establishment's theory of the birth of the universe, is nothing more than pseudoscientific nonsense in another of its vain, arrogant attempts to display its omnscience. Once again, the pseudoscientists are out in left field regarding a realistic response to a monumental question, therefore pull a ludicrous theory out of their hat The fact is, theBig Bang has been reduced to shreds by just one photograph, that of the "Hubble Deep Field." http://www.edconrad.com/images/istherereally.jpg And you can be sure, the Scientific Establishment very much regrets that it was ever taken. For years, the corupt Pseudoscientific Establishment has been jamming gobs of gibberish down our throat but this one photograph has certainly set them back on their heels, although it won't admit it.. You see, the mindboggling photo was taken long after their facetious theory of the Big Bang was first proposed -- at a time that no one had any idea of the unfathomable size and scope of the universe. The manufacture of such pablum decades ago -- long before the "Deep Field" photo -- could, indeed, have been accepted, with a grain of salt as being, well, remotely possible. But certainly not afterward, especially when it is fact, not fiction, that the scope and size of our universe is even beyond anyone's wildest imagination . To know for sure there is a stupendous array of galaxies in ALL directions, far from what the best conventional telescopes previoulsy had seen, presents even ANOTHER question that no scientist can answer: Just how immense is our universe, and does it ever end? That a Big Bang could've even been remotely responible for the existence of our universe is sheer folly, and to promulgate such fiction and fantasy is pseudoscientism at its best. And, be assured, when the Hubble someday likewise focuses on a teeny-weeny dark patch of sky as shown in the "Hubble Deep Field" photo -- if the Pseudosscientific Establishment can't prevent it from being taken - there will be a similiar scene of unfathomable magnificience, probably more majestic galaxies than are in the original "Deep Field" photo itself. Those patheic pseudoscieniss keep forgetting the words of the late, great Thomas Alva Edison: "We don't know one-tenth of one percent about anything." Ed Conrad http://www.edconrad.com Man as Old as Coal |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Popping The Big Bang | Jim Greenfield | Astronomy Misc | 701 | July 8th 07 05:40 PM |
Was the Big Bang an exploding Black Hole? | Val | Science | 0 | May 22nd 04 06:44 PM |
Most Distant X-Ray Jet Yet Discovered Provides Clues To Big Bang | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | November 17th 03 04:18 PM |
A dialogue between Mr. Big BANG and Mr. Steady STATE | Marcel Luttgens | Astronomy Misc | 12 | August 6th 03 06:15 AM |
Big bang question - Dumb perhaps | Graytown | History | 14 | August 3rd 03 09:50 PM |