![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Marcel Luttgens" wrote in message
om... "OG" wrote in message ... [snip] How many billions of years, we can only guess. Given a concentrated mass represented by the pre BB universe, is it fair to assume that time and space were very bent during that epoch? Nobody has a solid idea about a pre BB universe. Was it a mere mathematical point? Why is there an assumption of linear time flow? Especially during the time in which the proto universe begins its expansion and massive clumps of matter are streaming away from their brethren. How many inflations will the BBT need? Can anyone predict the state of affairs existed then and then make comparisons to a steady state model? I'd say it isn't a fair assumption that the two were the same. How do you explain that galaxies already existed 2 GY after the Big Bang, and that some of them are nearly as large as the largest galaxies in the universe today ? O' Marcel Luttgens |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Most Distant X-Ray Jet Yet Discovered Provides Clues To Big Bang | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | November 17th 03 04:18 PM |
Big bang question - Dumb perhaps | Graytown | History | 14 | August 3rd 03 09:50 PM |