oldest planet 13 billion years old in M-4

Sorry, this should have been posted last night when I heard the news
fresh from the TV == Lehrer Newshour. The problem with that news is they
do not do enough science reporting and they do too much poetry and that
silly-essay
segments of regular essayists. Science and technology is what created
the human
species (Stonethrowing created humans out of apes) and science and
technology
is the number one driving force of human society. So why does the Lehrer
Newshour spend a meagre average of about 2 seconds of news time for
science?????? Lehrer Newshour should replace their poetry and their
essay
segments with a regular Science & technology segment and give poetry and

essays that average of 2 seconds per week.

Last night the electric power went out and unable to post this about a
oldest
planet.

I am writing this from memory and not fresh and perhaps some errors. If
I remember correctly a large planet of 2.5 mass of Jupiter found in
Messier 4
globular cluster of the Milky Way galaxy.

Here immediately we have a problem with the age of the Milky Way itself
compared to this planet age. I do not recall any scientist pegging the
age of
the Milky Way as old as 13 billion years.

Anyway, according to the AtomTotality theory this news of an old planet
is
all par for the course. In fact, in the AtomTotality theory, here in our
own
SolarSystem the age of the inner planets of Mercury, Venus, Earth and
Mars
is that these inner planets are much older than the outer gas giant
planets.

In an AtomTotality, the age of Earth is of the Uranium AtomTotality and
our
Earth is perhaps 20 billion years old. Having been pummelled and
stripped of
its outer layers. Having been party to collisions and retaining the
heavy metal
cores (Moon). The outer gas giant planets are recent in age of perhaps 8
billion
years old and belong to the Plutonium AtomTotality minibang. However,
the
outer gas giants are accreting mass much faster than the inner planets
via
cosmicray-burst-materializations.

This news of an old planet of 13 billion years in M-4 will make more
sense
once it is found out and accepted that the planet Earth itself is at
least 13 billion
years old and that both are probably 20 billion years old for they
belong to
the age of the Uranium AtomTotality and not the age of the newest layer
of the
cosmos of the Plutonium AtomTotality.

I forgotten the name of the interviewed scientist Dr. Gross??? who made
mention
of the fact that M-4 planet had a different composition than our Jupiter
in that
it had more heavy metals and or ice. Anyway, if M-4 planet has a heavy
metal
composition approaching that of Earth, Venus, Mars, Mercury would
indicate
that these planets were of the Uranium AtomTotality age stretching back
as far
as 20 billion years.

In an AtomTotality of the observable universe being the 5f6 with its
last 6
electrons where galaxies are dots of the electron-dot-cloud then the
ages
of some stars and planets in the observable universe stretch back as far
as
the Thorium AtomTotality which can be as old as 30 billion years old.

Who knows, perhaps the Milky Way and Earth were born in the Thorium
AtomTotality and that their ages go back to 30 billion years. Perhaps
the
key to the age of any astro body is the composition and if a object has
alot of heavy elements such as uranium indicates the object is at least
30 billion years old.

That would be a nice thing for astronomy to have age reckoning based on
just one simply attribute-- relative abundance of heavy metal elements
in their composition. You see, although supernova do create heavy
elements
they are rare and they do not spread those new nucleosynthesized
elements
throughout the cosmos in any degree of efficiency. That means most
heavy elements that exist such as in Earth or Mercury were due to the
cosmic ray materialization of large amounts of energy over 30 billion
years.

Archimedes Plutonium,
whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots
of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies