![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Besides something nuclear going on, what's keeping the core and
subsequently the surface of a given planet like Earth so extra active and getting warmer by the day? Like Jupiter, does pressure alone give the necessary method of sustaining a core at a given geothermal sustainable status? What's the gravity or perhaps the vacuum at the center of Earth? In other words, without an active and extremely fluid core, and especially if without benefit of such a massive and nearby moon, why wouldn't this planet of ours become that of a mostly monoseason and somewhat icy environment? It seems Mars is not only worse off than icy, as likely a planetology that's dead to the core, but also having once been a mostly freshwater environment (Mars w/o salt), and otherwise seemingly older than Earth. What gives? Venus is still very much alive and kicking from the inside out, and w/ o moon none the less, as it's losing geothermal energy at roughly 256 fold greater than Earth. What gives? - Brad Guth |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
planetary heat losses | Darrell Lakin | History | 20 | August 15th 07 09:55 PM |
Brad Guth is...... | Tarapia Tapioco | Space Station | 19 | February 18th 04 04:03 PM |
Brad Guth is...... | Brad Guth | Policy | 18 | February 18th 04 04:03 PM |
Brad Guth is...... | OM | History | 0 | December 26th 03 11:36 PM |
Brad Guth is...... | OM | History | 0 | December 26th 03 11:34 PM |