![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As far as those questioning the need for human space exploration I
personally think it's one of the most important activities we should be doing today. I don't know why, I don't have a good reason except I would like to believe that humans can safely travel through space. Just chalk it up to human vanity and the need to know. As far as trashing the shuttles and the station I suppose we could but they are still extremely viable and we have spent far more on B.S. than we ever have on our space program. If we trashed the station then we wouldn't have the ability to keep people in space for extended periods meaning that any trip to Mars is just a dream. But what if ??? What if we built one or two large reliable space craft in orbit. They would not be intended to land on Earth so forget the heat problems. It would be accessed by the mini shuttle that is planned for 2012. They would be intended for astronauts to take very long trips, around the Moon, asteroid and comet visits, maybe a trip around Mars. That would solve several problems reasonably without the added risk of landing humans in alien evironments which can come later. Is this an idea or would it just be as bad as our current shuttles and station ??? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
G. Forbat's new theory of space REPLY to objections | Gary Forbat | Space Station | 0 | July 5th 04 02:27 AM |
Kerry criticizes Bush's space vision | Hop David | Policy | 78 | June 27th 04 03:59 PM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | April 2nd 04 12:01 AM |
NASA's Gateway To Space For Life Science Research Dedicated Today | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | November 19th 03 10:08 PM |
NASA Selects International Space Station Program Scientis | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | August 20th 03 06:38 AM |