Why are the 'Fixed Stars' so FIXED?

On Jul 4, 6:25 pm, HW@....(Henri Wilson) wrote:
On Wed, 04 Jul 2007 06:29:37 -0700, Jerry
wrote:

On Jul 4, 6:18 am, bz wrote:

Last time I looked inside a laser, there was absolutely
no sign of 'HW bunching'. Otherwise there would be
terrible keying 'chirp' [frequency shift] {which would
KILL gigabit data transfer over fiber}.

Unfortunately, Henri would explain that away by claiming
that the laser generates an "EM Control Frame" that
forces light to travel at c with respect to the laser.

Oh?
Are you suggesting taht light does NOT travel at
c wrt the laser?

No, I am suggesting that incompressible sawblade
photons are incompatible with the existence of
femtosecond laser pulses. There is no way to shape
them to fit within the pulse envelope. Your photon
model is nonsense.

Henri has an ad hoc kludge for everything, it seems.
Provided he doesn't have to provide math or actually
demonstrate his theory's predictive ability (beyond
fitting a few luminosity curves), everything about his
theory seems perfect to him.

My computer does the maths....and generates more
curves in a minute than DeSitter and Einstein could
produce in a million years..

GIGO

HWdaemons only seem to live in the space between
galaxies, so there is no way the phenomina can be
tested on earth or by sighting within our solar
system.

Henri once estimated that his "density threshold"
might be around 10^-22 Torr. That implies that BaTh
would be inoperative in interstellar space. Only the
space between galaxies has so hard a vacuum.

Yoiu must be good at making up hospital beds by
now. Why don't you stick to the things you know
something about and leave the brainwork to us experts?

I recognize many forms of mental illness by now.
Remember, I did a rotation in a psychiatric ward.

Contradicting himself, Henri continues to apply BaTh
theory to the "explanation" of variable star curves.
It seems that being the author of the WDT bodge gives
him the right to apply the bodge on an "as needed"
basis.

http://www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/group1.jpg
The latest one is interesting. It models an tidally
distored, egg shaped star to produce the presumed
cepheid 'overtone' effect. Makes one rethink whether or
not cepheids really DO go huff puff, eh?

You STILL haven't provided evidence that you can
simultaneously fit luminosity and radial velocity
curves.

From what I can see, your BaTh program STILL fails
even the simplest fits, despite your addition of
kludge after kludge.

I now think they just orbit some dark matter,
probably in tidal lock.

So now you suggest that your dark companions are
totally invisible except for gravitational effects?

Perhaps they only live in the space around stars that
do NOT have {semi} intellegent life on any of the
planets. That must be it.

Henri, I found another 'ad hoc fix' for you: it is
the presence of intellegent LIFE that forces light
to travel at c, where intellegent life is absent,
then the ballistic theory of light can freely reign.

Shades of John Wheeler!

The Wilsonian version of IT FROM BIT???

My theory is now almost complete ...and is quite consistent.

In your dreams...

Jerry

Henri Wilson's Faked Diploma
http://mysite.verizon.net/cephalobus...ri_diploma.htm

Henri Wilson's Use of Deceptive Language or,
Would You Buy A Used Ballistic Theory From This Man?
http://mysite.verizon.net/cephalobus..._deception.htm

RT Aurigae versus Emission Theory or,
Henri Wilson's Faked Program Output
http://mysite.verizon.net/cephalobus...rt_aurigae.htm

Henri Wilson Attempts to Rewrite the Historical Record
http://mysite.verizon.net/cephalobus...ri_history.htm