![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 16:50:54 -0600, in a place far, far away, Herb
Schaltegger made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that: In article , (Rusty B) wrote: According to Space Lift Washington, President Bush may announce at Kitty Hawk a return to manned lunar exploration but without any specific massive new funding, forcing NASA to get serious about what it wants to do with it considerable human spaceflight assets and decades of experience. Forgive me if I sound cynical but how ****ing stupid is that quote? ". . . forcing NASA to get serious . . ." PLEASE! In addition, just what "considerable human spaceflight assets" does NASA have that are helpful for going to the moon? And the agency doesn't have "decades of experience." Organizations don't have experience--people do, and many of the veterans are dead or retired. -- simberg.interglobal.org * 310 372-7963 (CA) 307 739-1296 (Jackson Hole) interglobal space lines * 307 733-1715 (Fax) http://www.interglobal.org "Extraordinary launch vehicles require extraordinary markets..." Swap the first . and @ and throw out the ".trash" to email me. Here's my email address for autospammers: |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sedna, space probes?, colonies? what's next? | TKalbfus | Policy | 265 | July 13th 04 12:00 AM |
Clueless pundits (was High-flight rate Medium vs. New Heavy lift launchers) | Rand Simberg | Space Science Misc | 18 | February 14th 04 03:28 AM |
Moon key to space future? | James White | Policy | 90 | January 6th 04 04:29 PM |
International Space Station Science - One of NASA's rising stars | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | December 27th 03 01:32 PM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | September 12th 03 01:37 AM |