A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Why are the 'Fixed Stars' so FIXED?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old May 15th 07, 11:27 PM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.astro
Henri Wilson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,378
Default Why are the 'Fixed Stars' so FIXED?

On Mon, 14 May 2007 23:08:40 +0000 (UTC), bz
wrote:

HW@....(Henri Wilson) wrote in
: ....
You've gotten it all wrong Bob.
Photon compression occurs during source acceleration. The end movement
is soon dampened out.


1) space between pulses and pulses must compress by same amount due to
one kind of doppler effect. To get the phase right, Henri has to posit
some kind of compression taking place in different amounts on the
space between pulses(space between photons) and the pulses (photons).
2) The BaTh predicts a inverted Shapiro delay.

Finally, Henri's BaTh still has the problem I have mentioned
elsewhere; the 'velocity unification aka extinction' effect that BaTh
needs to be at all viable is so 'unlikely' as to be thermodynamically
impossible AND there are no known mechanisms to accomplish what needs
to be accomplished.

It is NOT thermodynamically impossible. You never sem to come up with
an argument as to why it should be.

I thought I was quite clear.

Thermo dynamics requires that ordered things tend to disorder.

Unification of velocity requires bringing an unexplainable order on a
vast scale to things which start out systematically disordered. Photons
of different wavelength from different emission lines with different
rotational doppler shifts, starting out at different times, at different
speeds (both slower than c and faster than c) must 'unify'.

The odds of such a thing happening on a small scale would be like
flipping a normal 'fair' coin and having it alway land heads up.

The odds of it happening on a cosmic scale are astronomically small.

It is much more likely that your hot cup of coffee should suddenly,
spontainiously, vaporize and leave behind cubes of frozen water.

It can't happen.


It's just a direct application of Maxwell's equation.


Light moving at c, as measured from ANY inertial FoR is a direct
application of Maxwell's equations.

The 'unification' of the speeds of light for batches moving at c-v and c+v
is NOT 'a direct application of Maxwell's equations'.
Maxwell's equations make no provision for light to move at c-v or c+v.
Maxwell's equations require that all EM waves move exactly at c.

No c-v, no c+v under maxwells equations.

Try again. And let me know when your coffee suddenly freezes because
otherwise, there is no way to speed up those c-v photons.


I wont bother trying to explain again. The process is quite simple.



www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm

Einstein's Relativity - the greatest HOAX since jesus christ's virgin mother.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fixed for a price? [email protected] Amateur Astronomy 5 May 18th 05 06:33 PM
Spirit Fixed! Greg Crinklaw UK Astronomy 1 January 25th 04 02:56 AM
Spirit Fixed! Greg Crinklaw Amateur Astronomy 0 January 24th 04 08:09 PM
I think I got it fixed now. Terrence Daniels Space Shuttle 0 July 2nd 03 07:53 PM
I think I got it fixed now. Terrence Daniels Policy 0 July 2nd 03 07:53 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.