Why are the 'Fixed Stars' so FIXED?

On Sun, 1 Apr 2007 14:36:54 +0100, "George Dishman"
wrote:


"Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 23:34:03 +0100, "George Dishman"
wrote:
"Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message
...
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 12:04:08 +0100, "George Dishman"
wrote:

Not at all, I expect you to model J1909-3744, PSR1613+16
and J0737-3039A/B ...
...
When you can plot linear velocities (blue and red) with
scales in m/s and brightness curves in magnitude as well
as relate them to the orbital phase using the Shapiro
effect and use those to determine the orbital parameters
and the speed equalisation distance, then we will look at
all three. My guess is that you will find more excuses
for not doing the work because you are scared of what you
will find.

You are asking me to match data, wrongly interpreted with Einsteiniana,
..

No, I'm challenging you to match the data recorded at
the observatory using ballistic theory only, but that
includes matching the orbital phase.

How do we know the orbital phase of a variable star George?

Who is talking about variable stars Henry? You suggested
I didn't want to look at PSR1613+16 but now you want to
change the subject.


The theory is that its orbit is highly elliptical and precessing at a known
rate. I say this pulsar has a nearly circular orbit and maybe its transverse
velocity could explain that willusion.

I also point out that I don't accept any published astronomical data that is
based on grossly wrong values of orbital velocities.

George



Einstein's Relativity - the greatest HOAX since jesus christ's mother.