A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Why are the 'Fixed Stars' so FIXED?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old March 26th 07, 09:25 AM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.astro
Henri Wilson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,378
Default Why are the 'Fixed Stars' so FIXED?

On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 23:34:03 +0100, "George Dishman"
wrote:


"Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 12:04:08 +0100, "George Dishman"

wrote:


Not at all, I expect you to model J1909-3744, PSR1613+16
and J0737-3039A/B but I've learned from experience that
you waste a lot of time looking at multiple examples if
you haven't got the software right for the first one.


The original software is correct to 1 part in c/v...except maybe for a few
orbit diameters from the source.


The _original_ software was wrong by four orders of
magnitude, but that's going back a bit and I think
you fixed that.


It wasn't wrong and it didn't need fixing.
My 'incompressible photon' model was the problem.

More recently you said you didn't
get a phase shift at near zero distance when I
asked what distance gave 45 degrees. Hopefully you
have now fixed that.


The phase shift is 90...at short distances but 'moves' as the emission delay
becomes less important.

The pulse separation method is completely accurate for circular obits,
(for
one star only)
You George, have never produced even ONE brightness curve...nor are you
capable
of doing so.


I did last year, or have you forgotten.


Ony a rough one.

When you can plot linear velocities (blue and red) with
scales in m/s and brightness curves in magnitude as well
as relate them to the orbital phase using the Shapiro
effect and use those to determine the orbital parameters
and the speed equalisation distance, then we will look at
all three. My guess is that you will find more excuses
for not doing the work because you are scared of what you
will find.


You are asking me to match data, wrongly interpreted with Einsteiniana, ..


No, I'm challenging you to match the data recorded at
the observatory using ballistic theory only, but that
includes matching the orbital phase.


How do we know the orbital phase of a variable star George?

using a
theory that ridicules Einsteiniana. That's a bit pointless isn't it?

That's only a guess, I don't know what they will show
myself, but you won't take the risk whereas I will. Sort
your program, then we can put it to use.


My program is sorted George...
It isn't available yet though.


OK, I'll wait.

George



"When a true genius appears in the world, you may know
him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."
--Jonathan Swift.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fixed for a price? [email protected] Amateur Astronomy 5 May 18th 05 06:33 PM
Spirit Fixed! Greg Crinklaw UK Astronomy 1 January 25th 04 02:56 AM
Spirit Fixed! Greg Crinklaw Amateur Astronomy 0 January 24th 04 08:09 PM
I think I got it fixed now. Terrence Daniels Space Shuttle 0 July 2nd 03 07:53 PM
I think I got it fixed now. Terrence Daniels Policy 0 July 2nd 03 07:53 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.