![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message ... On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 23:22:08 -0000, "George Dishman" wrote: ... So now that we have confirmed the phase is OK, what does your program give for the velocity from the blue curve when the red matches the observations and distance is 3720 light years Henry? You seem to be saying you have done the work and got a linear scale to read it off but you haven't actually given me the number yet. Like I said, I can only give you a figure for the product (blue velocity x distance). Like I said, the distance is 3720 light years. For instance, for an extinction distance of about 120 Ldays, and a red velocity variation of 0.00019, the blue velocity is about 15m/s. For 12 Ldays, the blue velocity is 150 m/s. OK, so for a distance of 3720 light years or 1357830 light days that would be 15 * 120 / 1357800 = 0.0013 m/s The orbital circumference would be that times 1.5 days or 172 m, a radius of 27 m. Do you agree with those numbers? Just as a matter of curiosity, what is your value for the eccentricity? The next question, again assuming no extinction, is what orbital inclination would you need to get a reasonable radius. If you don't follow my reason for asking, it is that a nearly face-on orbit will give a low radial component of the velocity even for high actual speeds. George |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fixed for a price? | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 5 | May 18th 05 06:33 PM |
Spirit Fixed! | Greg Crinklaw | UK Astronomy | 1 | January 25th 04 02:56 AM |
Spirit Fixed! | Greg Crinklaw | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | January 24th 04 08:09 PM |
I think I got it fixed now. | Terrence Daniels | Space Shuttle | 0 | July 2nd 03 07:53 PM |
I think I got it fixed now. | Terrence Daniels | Policy | 0 | July 2nd 03 07:53 PM |