![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The duck seems unduly fixated on the aberration of gravity issue fer
some obscure reason. Since it's agreed that *there is no aberration*, wherein is the problem? The problem as it were, is in the need to reconcile Einstein's oriiginal assertion that gravity propagates at c with the observed fact that it's instantaneous (indicated by absence of aberration). So some really wild gymnastics and ad hockery is applied to try to bridge the abyss.. rather than admitting the obvious- Einstein was simply wrong on this one. The 'speed of gravity' is functionally instantaneous just as Newton originally observed, plain and simple. The duck's obsession with Carlip's stuff is a tempest in a teapot over nothing. Same goes for Fomalont-Kopeikin's stuff. oc Header address is a spam trap. E-mail: oldcoot7074 at sbcglobal.net Change 'at' to @ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Infinite Universe versus volatile Universe | G. L. Bradford | Policy | 3 | June 21st 06 12:49 PM |
Spirit in the Sky Funerals | Funeral Director Earthling109 | Policy | 0 | March 5th 05 08:36 PM |
I know how to fix the Spirit | Carsten A. Arnholm | UK Astronomy | 1 | January 30th 04 08:22 AM |
Spirit | Eric Fenby | Technology | 0 | January 30th 04 03:45 AM |