![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is mainly about 'fields' and the complete absence of them.
Imagine if there were only one piece of matter in the whole universe, a single electron. We know that the electron has an electric field around itself that will repel like charges and attract unlike ones. Its strength tapers off with distance according to an inverse square law. In the physical sense, we have no idea what makes a 'field'. Now the question we must ask is, what happens as we move further and further away from the electron. Does its field strength become infintely weaker and weaker? ...or is there a point where it can be reduced no more and becomes fragmented. In other words, is there a point where the electron field becomes so weak that it can be no longer be reduced in strength? Can a point be reached where the field of the electron doesn't permanently exist at all? ARE FIELDS QUANTIZED? Would there be regions of space where 'field quanta' are so rare that most of that region literally consists of 'absolutely nothing'? In space there are gravitational 'fields', electric fields, magnetic fields and possibly a few that we know nothing about.. No matter where we go in the universe, we will presumeably see distant stars and fall freely under the influence of some gravitational system....so EM is reaching us regularly. .....but is it possible that in very remote space, the fields that make up EM and gravity become literally 'full of holes'? My hypothesis says that 'empty' space somewhat resembles felted fibre or foam polystyrene, where the fibrous or plastic bits resemble the field 'quanta' whilst the holes consist of genuine 'nothing'. The holes are very temporary since EM carrying its own fields passes through them continuously, partially destroying them. Because 'Wilsonian nort-holes' consist of nothing, they have no properties, no geometry, no time. The concept of an infinite nort-hole presents no real problem since the word 'nothing' in reality implies a genuine 'absence of anything' and without anything, the concept of infinity doesn't really exist. It is possible that huge nort-holes separate all the individual universes that make up space. Light travels through a nort-hole purely ballistically since there is no intrinsic dielectric constant or magnetic permeability there. Maxwell's equations have no relevance in a nort-hole. Any attempt to investigate a nort-hole will destroy it. The 'Wilson Density Threshold' is that at which nort-holes first start to appear. (Note: 'density' refers to both matter and fields, here) As the density decreases, so does the proportion of 'nothing' in any volume. Indeed, since nort-holes possess no spatial properties, the true volume of what we presently refer to as 'empty space' must be redefined to mean 'that volume actually occupied by field quanta which exist there'. It is a distinct possibility that lengths as well as volumes are effectively 'contracted' in most of intergalactic space. What makes space carrying field quanta different from that which is completely devoid of any is a question that remains to be answered. It is reasonable to assume that space that contains a fields |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Does My Convex Space Theory Give Space Expansion the 5th Dimension? | G=EMC^2 Glazier | Misc | 2 | September 2nd 06 12:41 AM |
Mt.Wilson | Mark F. | Amateur Astronomy | 46 | December 20th 05 03:55 PM |
Perseids from Mount Wilson | Mike Simmons | Amateur Astronomy | 12 | August 16th 05 09:43 PM |
Mt Wilson Record | Starlord | Amateur Astronomy | 30 | July 29th 05 09:33 AM |
Winter is coming to Mt. Wilson | Matthew Ota | Amateur Astronomy | 16 | November 8th 04 09:18 PM |