![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
FYI:
Jack Sarfatti wrote: Click on http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/einstein/node3.html "In any event, we may summarize Einstein's equation as follows: (2) This equation says that positive energy density and positive pressure curve spacetime in a way that makes a freely falling ball of point particles tend to shrink. Since E = mc^2 and we are working in units where c = 1, ordinary mass density counts as a form of energy density. Thus a massive object will make a swarm of freely falling particles at rest around it start to shrink. In short: gravity attracts." Written in 1996 before the discovery of exotic dark energy dominating the cosmos. "We promised to state Einstein's equation in plain English, but have not done so yet. Here it is: Given a small ball of freely falling test particles initially at rest with respect to each other, the rate at which it begins to shrink is proportional to its volume times: the energy density at the center of the ball, plus the pressure in the x direction at that point, plus the pressure in the y direction, plus the pressure in the z direction." OK, now for any quantum field in absence of Casimir plates to begin with: ZPF energy density = - pressure in any Cartesian direction this comes from 1. special relativity Lorentz covariance 2. Einstein's equivalence principle that, in this case may be conveniently, though technically arcane, restated as: non-geodesic g-forces in observer-detector LNIF non-inertial frames (created by non-gravity forces) are 100% inertial geometrodynamic level connection fields without any non-zero tensor part in the absence of torsion fields. i.e. anti-Z formulation! ;-) so that w = -1 In general we want w - 1/3 in presence of Casimir type boundary constraints. In that case positive source energy density is "exotic" creating anti-gravity repulsion. On Jan 7, 2007, at 7:27 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote: On Jan 7, 2007, at 6:17 PM, Mark McCandlish wrote: Hi Jack; While I may not have the math quite right, I believe I did mention a "positive and negative ZPF pressure", but my perspective was based on the (then) recent paper in Physics Essays, by Miguel Alcubierri, whose paper I cited described the modification of the local spacetime metric as and "expansion" and "contraction" of the metric to produce a vector upon which the vehicle creating the distortion would move-- all without violating GR. I replied to Mark: Well that would be great if you did. Can you confirm that with some authenticated documentation? If so, then you beat me to it by 8 years! Precognitive remote viewing on your part? I will cite you on this if you can send me some proof as I have been saying this in my books and papers only since 2002 spurred by the discovery of dark energy starting in 1999. How come Puthoff never mentioned it? What did it for me is my realization that not only is 73% of the universe negative pressure dark zero point energy virtual quanta, but that 23% is positive pressure zero point energy virtual quanta and only 4% is on-mass-shell real quanta of leptons, quarks and gauge bosons. http://www-conf.slac.stanford.edu/ss...age_12_jpg.htm http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/6235751.stm On Jan 7, 2007, at 6:17 PM, Mark McCandlish wrote: "Hi Jack; While I may not have the math quite right, I believe I did mention a "positive and negative ZPF pressure", but my perspective was based on the (then) recent paper in Physics Essays, by Miguel Alcubierri, whose paper I cited described the modification of the local spacetime metric as and "expansion" and "contraction" of the metric to produce a vector upon which the vehicle creating the distortion would move-- all without violating GR. My personal view is that the application of the plate capacitors as in the ARV layout is only incidental to this distortion of the metric and only serves to "shape" the propulsive effect for directional changes, much like the swash plate on the main rotor of a helicopter." I replied: I don't understand how your plate capacitors will generate the different pressures in different parts of the fuselage needed for the drive to work. Essentially we have "ZPF energy density" plotted on vertical in picture below. Without Russian torsionics from localizing the Poincare group to get string theorie's 10D manifold, we could not have variations in space and time of Einstein's cosmological constant Lambda essential to how the alien ET flying saucers work! htttp://shipov.com http://www.usask.ca/psychology/sarty/warp/warp.gif http://www.astrosciences.info/WarpDr...s/image024.jpg This last image is best as it shows the blue shift of repulsive dark ZPF energy negative pressure and the red shift of attractive dark ZPF "matter" positive pressure. Here it is the quantum vacuum pressure that is plotted. The ship moves to left creating its own geodesic. However, I also have something like capacitors i.e. nano quantum wells with 2D anyon condensates phase locked to the coherent vacuum ODLRO Goldstone phases in my theory of emergent tetrads and spin connections. McClandish: "You have to remember my viewpoint is only based on eye-witness testimony," Me: Nothing better than that, e.g. Paul Hill's deductions in "UFOs" best book in the field. McClandish: "my own study of the peer-reviewed papers, my once-frequent discussions with Hal (Puthoff) and personal observations of these craft in action on multiple occasions. If you asked me to solve a physics equation, I would be completely lost." Me: Again how come Hal has never published anything like this before I did in 2002? Does Hal have a secret set of papers for Black Ops and he only shows the ZPF Haisch stuff and his PV stuff as a smoke screen to throw competitors off the track? I mean disinformation. Regards, Mark ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jack Sarfatti" To: "Mark McCandlish" Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 3:43 PM Subject: Hubble makes 3D dark matter map & flying saucer propulsion I mean since I have been listening. Also exactly how to control ZPF was not known back then in 1994. Did you mention the key notion how one needs both ZPF of positive and negative pressure to get weightless warp drive without g-forces? That's the key insight from me, to my knowledge, that Hal Puthoff has never even acknowledged. If you have that on record back in 1994 show me and I will cite it. It's not enough to say simply "ZPF" without some at least qualitative details. Jack Sarfatti On Jan 7, 2007, at 3:20 PM, Mark McCandlish wrote: Hi, Jack; The suggestion that no discussion about real UFO propulsion technology has occurred on Coast To Coast AM is not true. I spoke about a ZPF connection to this technology starting in late 1994, and while the aspects that you are dealing with are far beyond the comprehension of 99% of the audience, there are those with some understanding of the physics who WILL listen, and listen closely. I know; I have corresponded with many of them. Since '94 I have been on the program about six times. ... deleted sensitive content on Black Ops ... Begin forwarded message: From: Jack Sarfatti Date: January 7, 2007 2:36:31 PM PST To: Sarfatti_Physics_Seminars Subject: Hubble makes 3D dark matter map & flying saucer propulsion Most people in UFOlogy and at NASA/STAIF advanced concepts in propulsion are simply not able to follow the physics I am talking about here. It falls on deaf ears in America but not in Russia and not in other places hostile to America. Even on Coast to Coast AM they have not at all talked about the real UFO technology but have only had disinformation on The Right Stuff presented. Begin forwarded message: From: Jack Sarfatti Date: January 7, 2007 2:17:27 PM PST To: Sarfatti_Physics_Seminars Subject: BBC NEWS | Science/Nature | Hubble makes 3D dark matter map This is consistent with my theory that both dark energy and dark matter are w = -1 zero point quantum fluctuation energy of negative and positive pressure respectively. The w = -1 positive pressure of negative energy density mimics w = 0 Cold Dark Matter (CDM) for distant observers because it clumps under its own self- attraction opposite to dark energy that tends to spread from its self-repulsion. However, put the two together properly (needs Russian torsion fields) to get weightless warp drive Jack Sarfatti "If we knew what it was we were doing, it would not be called research, would it?" - Albert Einstein http://www.authorhouse.com/BookStore...x?bookid=23999 http://lifeboat.com/ex/bios.jack.sarfatti http://qedcorp.com/APS/Dec122006.ppt http://video.google.com/videoplay? docid=-1310681739984181006&q=Sarfatti+Causation&hl=en http://www.flickr.com/photos/lub/sets/72157594439814784 On Jan 7, 2007, at 1:46 PM, Kim Burrafato wrote: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/6235751.stm |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Flying Saucer Warp Drive | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 2 | September 4th 05 10:44 PM |
Sarfatti Lectures in Warp Drive Physics 1 | Autymn D. C. | Astronomy Misc | 0 | July 27th 05 09:52 AM |
Apollo-16 'saucer' identified -- NOT a 'flying saucer' | Jim Oberg | History | 1 | May 13th 05 07:03 PM |
We have the basic elements for a "warp drive" | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 18 | June 25th 04 07:50 PM |
UFO Warp Drive (corrections) | Chillyvek | Astronomy Misc | 0 | August 24th 03 08:34 PM |