Has anyone seen P.Hucker around?

Well, Pud is still hollering "name one" prediction that differs from the
standard model's. As has been stated several times already, deep past
look-back sees 1aSN appearing dimmer than they 'should be', which is
interpredted as evidence of 'ever-accelerating expansion' of the
universe. Whereas when a deep past _cosmological density gradient_ of
the spatial medium is factored in, the expansion curve is shifted toward
DEcelertaing expansion and a closed universe. Also, 'tiny' density
gradients appear locally in the gravity wells of stars, such as seen in
the anomalous acceleration of the Pioneer spacecraft.
As stated many times already, the spatial medium
_demonstrates itself_ unequivocally and profoundly by its abundant
effects, particularly in the behavior of gravity. The reality of the
spatial medium supplies _explanations of why_ constants (like c) are
what they are.. instead of requiring one to simply accept _on faith_
they "just are".
Regarding the 'magical messengers' i.e., photons,
there's NO argument with the quantization of light as seen in the
photoelectric effect (for which Uncle Albert received the Nobel), or in
diffration grate experiments. But at real-world amplitudes, the
'particle' nature falls away and these are WAVES, baby. Waves in their
carrier medium which fixes their high propagation speed. Waves whose
potential amplitude has no known upper limit. To hang onto the notion of
"photons" at amplitudes higher than seen in the PE effect is just plain
childish and silly.
And the void-droids believe in radio wave "photons" at
ELF wavelengths such as used in submarine signalling. These 'messenger
particles' are miles long and travel thru deep ocean. And there's
"phonons"- sound wave 'particles' fer chrissakes. Clearly there's no
chance of rational discourse with anyone who's mind-locked to this level
of *religious* zealotry in the guise of science.
oc