![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Greg Neill" wrote in message m... "Hagar" wrote in message ... I am still confused about seeing these images from the past. Take the BB, for instance. It's image has been traveling radially at the speed of light ever since it happened. Shortly after the BB, physical matter started to slow down and began to clump together, thus further slowing down. Along the way, about 8 billion years later, Earth formed. By my estimation, the image of the BB has traveled way beyond the Earth, the edge of the visible Universe, even and is lost forever, at least as a pictorial visual. It is almost as if someone shoots a pistol, then taking off running in the same direction and claiming to catch the bullet just before it hits the ground. Your model of the Big Bang is flawed; you're picturing everything rushing out of an explosion into pre-existing space. The BB was an explosion (expansion) of space itself, occurred everywhere (everywhere that existed) at once, and there was no center. OK, I'll bite on this one: if there was NO space before the BB, what was there instead ?? The expansion was so fast that light from events that happened even relatively close to one another could not reach each other since the space between expanded at many times the speed of light itself. That's been termed as "hyper-inflation", since there was nothing to impede the outward expansion into the existing, infinite VOID of space!! We're seeing light that left those (then) "nearby" events just arriving now. So when we look out into space in *any* direction, we're looking back in time towards the Big Bang. Once again, you cannot shoot a gun and then run fast enough to where the bullet finally hits the ground, spin around and take a photograph of the muzzle flsh. As far as the background emissions, I think that the Universe wants to be at the absolute Zero, but the combined radiation of the billions of galaxies is enough to keep the ambient galactic temperature at about 3.5 or so degrees above zero. As they are receding from each other, that is very slowly dropping towards zero, and by the time the last stars blip out into oblivion, everything will stop. Nope. The cosmic background radiation is much more uniform than the clumpy matter concentrations of galaxies, and matches the curve of black body radiation very precisely. COBE determined that the background radiation is indeed NOT uniform, but rather blotchy. Even though that difference is measured in fractions of a degree K, nonetheless it matches the "clumpiness" of galaxy cluster distribution throughout the observable universe. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model | newedana | Astronomy Misc | 236 | May 2nd 06 09:25 AM |
[sci.astro] Cosmology (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (9/9) | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 6th 05 02:37 AM |
Can't get out of the universe "My crew will blow it up"!!!!!!!!!!! | zetasum | Space Shuttle | 0 | February 4th 05 11:11 PM |
Can't get out of the universe "My crew will blow it up"!!!!!!!!!!! | zetasum | Space Station | 0 | February 4th 05 11:10 PM |