Toward understanding the Double Slit Experiment, pt. 1

Y.Porat wrote:
Ralph Hertle wrote:

Toward understanding the Double Slit Experiment, pt. 1
alt.astronomy
sci.physics.relativity
alt.sci.physics



Y.Porat wrote:

[....]


-------------------------------
Dear Mr Kinane

you are asking about entring one photon!!

while me and apparently you as well
do not know
what is** one** photon !!!
what is a single photon definition??

before starting walking we have to learn how to crawl
ist that ??

TIA
Y.Porat
--------------------------------



Y. Porat:

If questions are a measure of intelligence then you are a genius.

The religionist creationists and the Doppler-Hubble creationists,
and maybe other sorts of expansionist creationists, base all their
conclusions either upon the Bible or upon the Apparent Red Shift
of EM spectral light frequencies.

They adamantly refuse to consider the interaction of photons
and electrons regarding interactions and velocity differentials.

They are totally intellectually closed on that topic. By that they
refuse to gain information regarding, not the origin of the
universe, but its cause insofar as the identity and properties
of the existents that continue to exist, however changed due
to their properties or potentials.

What is more, they refuse to accept that the entity that is the
photon has any identity whatsoever, albeit, except for a few
magnificently discovered properties of photons, e.g., refraction
and gravitational influences, and more.

They actually don't have any idea at all about what the photon is,
and yet they make stupendous pronouncements regarding
suppositions of the assumed causes of the universe.

They don't even know what the properties of gravity existents
are, much less what the substance of matter or energy is.

They are intellectually and factually bankrupt.

More so, they have not opened their eyes to see that the
universe exists continually, that is everything that exists, - e.g.,
would you believe, without start, interruption, or end, continually.
The universe simply continues to exist and its plural existents to
function according to their natural properties.

You said it right.

Scientists, especially astronomer creationist cosmologist
physicists, have no clue whatsoever what a photon is.

They posture madly about the supposed original
discontinuities of the universe, qua their assumed
creationism, this or that nothingness, let alone about what
universal termination is, and still they don't even know what
a photon is.

Or any of the existing existents of existence.

The gentleman has asked the question.

What is the photon?

Ralph Hertle

----------------
Thank you Ralph

now to be more precise the key question is:

WHAT IS THE **QUANTITATIVE DEFINITION OF A SINGLE PHOTON**??!!

it sems that people speak about a 'single photon' whithout knowing
about aht they are talking
without that definition all the talking about a single photon is
nonsense physics

so ??? waht is the above definition????
does a photon that is emmited from Radium is the same as that form
say nickel evn if the frequescy of them are the same
to be even more specific :

is the **duration of emittance** is the same in radion 'single photon'
as in say Kalium 'single photon ' ????!!!!

TIA
Y.Porat
------------------------------

TIA
Y.Porat
--------------




Y.Porat:

Excellent.

I wish I had the knowledge with which to answer your questions.

I'm not an expert in the field of photonics, however, you raise a
question that I have never heard prior. Are photons of similar
energy levels that are emitted from different sources the same,
or not? And, of course, if so or not, why?

Ralph Hertle