![]() |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message . com,
Weatherlawyer writes Jonathan Silverlight wrote: they are caused by two bodies dragging water around a body with various irregularly shaped land masses. One of the most entertaining accounts of this I know of is Fritz Lieber's novel "The Wanderer", where the situation is complicated by the appearance of an Earth-mass body near the Moon prompting one character to exclaim "At last, a really challenging example of the three-body problem" When you use emoticons it means the joke needs explaining. When the joke needs... Ah never mind. Never mind the drivel, You're one post away from my kill file, and I'm being generous. You're just another troll with a fake hotmail address posting via Google. Or a complete idiot. Or both. I want to know how the moon can drag a particle up from the earth considering the masses and distances involved. Gravity. Works over infinite distance, though it obeys an inverse square law (tides obey an inverse cube law). And why if it works on volumes with very little gravity of their own, it doesn't have the same effect on more imposing particulate. Could you translate that into standard English? Besides which, if the three body problem is in a constant state of flux as one planet invokes movement on another, how does the distant planet affect subdivisions of the other. And another thing: If the moon can raise water on the earth, why can't the earth raise sand on the moon? IIRC a crystal of silicon dioxide or whatever sand is, is some 3 times more dense than water but the moon's gravity is 1/6th. I would have thought that on the theory most here are defending (without the benefit of a schoolboy's primer may I add) the moon would have tidal mountains and hills. That's an odd way of putting it, but it does. If you took the trouble to learn anything at all about the subject, you would find that the Moon's shape is permanently deformed from a spherical shape. Look at http://www.astronomycafe.net/qadir/q277.html for instance. Because the Earth has 81 times the mass of the Moon it has not yet stopped rotating relative to the Moon, so the bulge moves round the planet. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Article on Tides | Matthew Ota | Amateur Astronomy | 14 | June 24th 06 12:00 AM |
Tides | Starlord | Misc | 0 | June 21st 06 06:05 PM |
Satellite capture first-ever gravity map of tides under antarcticice (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | News | 0 | December 6th 05 04:11 PM |
Strong Earth Tides Can Trigger Earthquakes, UCLA Scientists Report(Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 21st 04 09:56 PM |
Quasar variation - no time-dilation found by Mike Hawkins | Robin Whittle | Research | 4 | August 14th 04 08:31 PM |