A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification

Phineas T Puddleduck schreef:

On 8/7/06 21:16, in article
, "Warhol"
wrote:

Just connect the dots... the criminals remain the same tru history
anyway...

The famous "first human path on the moon" in the Warhol World...

Is impossible! For to print a foothprint like that in the moon dust,
you need moisture and there is NO moisture on the moon!

Your knowledge of science is breahtaking in its scope. As in, narrowness of
them.


oops and you bitch are ugly! HAH...


Here is the picture from "moon landing " expedition.

http://www.primeline-america.com/moon-ldg/

Personally, I like the best the moon scooter with that radial (inverted
parasol-like) antenna, wow, that's cute... Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha Halo
alpha papa tango charly we are riding on the Moon... hi hi hi the
American dream... you take your car everywhere with you...even to the
moon... aint that a funny joke.

Whats it like being an utter ****wit, Warhol? Riding the tails of the space
cadets...


--

Also, have you ever compared the "moon" videos space combinations to
those that are used actually and then in lower orbit?

With the solar eruptions that occured during that first "moon mission"
the astronauts would had their DNA fried...