![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Joe Jakarta" wrote in message oups.com... George Dishman wrote: "Finder" wrote in message reenews.net... "greysky" wrote in message .net... "Finder" wrote in message reenews.net... Their model is very slightly off, and needs no adjusting. Only 8,000 miles off after 34 years at flying 27,000 mph is Excellent! I doubt that we can even measure 8,000 mi at that distance anyway. It's 8,000 miles per year. Add it up since the early 1980's and you have a big problem with gravitational theory. Bullpuppy. It travels 236,520,000 in one year, and it is within 0.000338% of expected. The mass of the sun is not known to that precision, nor the mass of the spacecraft. The anomaly is a linear variation of speed from the trajectory which is the best fit to the data. Any adjustment to the mass (strictly the GM product) for the Sun would have an effect that varied as the inverse square of the distance instead of proportional to distance which is what is observed. EM waves vary according to an inverse-first-power law. That's the amplitude, what is measured is the frequency which is unaffected by distance. George |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
30 Years of Pioneer Spacecraft Data Rescued: The Planetary Society Enables Study of the Mysterious Pioneer Anomaly | [email protected] | News | 0 | June 6th 06 05:35 PM |
New Horizon pluto mission might investigate Pioneer 10 anomaly | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | November 6th 05 06:43 AM |
Pioneer anomaly x disappears.!! | brian a m stuckless | Policy | 0 | October 29th 05 10:16 AM |
Pioneer anomaly x disappears.!! | brian a m stuckless | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 29th 05 10:16 AM |