![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 04:01:33 GMT, in a place far, far away, Dick
Morris made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that: Endless population growth does not work on a finite planet. I've never proposed endless population growth. You've never admitted to any particular physical limits that I've seen either. It seemed beside the point, since we're so far from them it's not worth discussing. Obviously if we were to somehow get to the point at which the entire mass of the planet were converted to writhing blob of humanity, that would be overdoing it. Is that your limit? Don't see any limits short of turning the Earth into a writhing blob of humanity? Probably, but again, they're theoretical, not of relevance to a discussion about whether we're currently "overpopulated," or even close to it. Do you mean to tell me that you cannot see the rampant political correctness on the anti-environmental right? You obviously have no idea what political correctness means. I saw enough of it on the radical left to know it when I saw it on the radical right. I was a conservative for 40 years, so I had a belly full of it by the time the Soviet Union collapsed and the right adopted the environmental movement as it's new bogeyman. I know political correctness whenever I see someone refuse to answer a question and back up their opinion with facts. Not being now, or ever, a conservative, I wouldn't know. Ehrlich? You're joking, right? If you think it's all a joke, then you're the one who is not to be taken seriously. Sadly, it's not a joke, because people like Ehrlich have caused needless suffering and misguided millions through his fundamental ignorance of ecology, technology and economics. Were you, by any chance, a business major? No, multiple degrees in engineering and engineering management (one of which was engineering science, something that environmentalists seem to take no interest in). Apparently you failed to notice that your hero, Julian Simon, was utterly clueless about ecology and technology, and managed to delude himself into thinking that the issue was strictly about economics. Remember how we were going to make copper from other metals? Ehrlich is a biologist who has forgotten more about ecology than all the right-wing anti-environmentalists put together will ever know. You might explain how Ehrlich caused suffering by warning people of what was coming. By warning of things that were coming that never came. Bad government policies are one way to impoverish people, but not the only way. Without access to sufficient resources, prosperity is impossible, regardless of government policies. You continue to not realize that people themselves are the ultimate resource. Try "energy". Remove the entire civilized world and the tribal peoples in the Amazon, etc. would never notice. Nor would wolfpacks. What's your point? Turn off the Sun and everybody dies in a remarkably short time. Yes. So? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
National Space Policy: NSDD-42 (issued on July 4th, 1982) | Stuf4 | Space Shuttle | 150 | July 28th 04 07:30 AM |
European high technology for the International Space Station | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | May 10th 04 02:40 PM |
Clueless pundits (was High-flight rate Medium vs. New Heavy lift launchers) | Rand Simberg | Space Science Misc | 18 | February 14th 04 03:28 AM |
Moon key to space future? | James White | Policy | 90 | January 6th 04 04:29 PM |
International Space Station Science - One of NASA's rising stars | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | December 27th 03 01:32 PM |