![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() G EddieA95 wrote: And lowering the human population won't? No. Population stabilization can be accomplished voluntarily with the appropriate incentives. Absent mass immigration, we wouldn't be too far from that now. No one is *immigrating* into Earth. AIUI, the issue is world P, not US P. "We" means the US. The US is not overpopulated by any stretch of imagination. Not at present, as far as subsistence is concerned, but then our present population is heavily dependent on fossil fuels for our energy supply. Replacing all of that energy with renewable sources will be difficult and very expensive. Things may get very interesting somewhere around the middle of the century. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
National Space Policy: NSDD-42 (issued on July 4th, 1982) | Stuf4 | Space Shuttle | 150 | July 28th 04 07:30 AM |
European high technology for the International Space Station | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | May 10th 04 02:40 PM |
Clueless pundits (was High-flight rate Medium vs. New Heavy lift launchers) | Rand Simberg | Space Science Misc | 18 | February 14th 04 03:28 AM |
Moon key to space future? | James White | Policy | 90 | January 6th 04 04:29 PM |
International Space Station Science - One of NASA's rising stars | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | December 27th 03 01:32 PM |