![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A *link* is not proof. A cite to an actual, existing, verifiable document is
Nproof. *Never* accept a website as proof of anything involving NASA; at best, it would be a copy of an actual piece of paper, even if it were an actual NASA website. Scott Hedrick, Now even a fully certified link to an official NASA page is getting the moonboot kick in the butt, especially if there's anything the least bit skewed or potentially capable of getting interpreted that doesen't reinforce their NASA/Apollo ruse/sting of the century. Imagine that, and why am I not the least bit surprised. I suppose next they'll have to start their evidence excluding upon their very own archives of most all of those NASA/Apollo Kodak moments, including those more interesting ones of somewhat if not entirely of better science as having been obtained from orbit. - Brad Guth |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ISS needs to go to the MOON, with or w/o crew | Brad Guth | Policy | 1 | March 31st 05 12:58 AM |
Apollo | Buzz alDredge | Astronomy Misc | 5 | July 28th 04 10:05 AM |
The apollo faq | the inquirer | Misc | 4 | April 15th 04 04:45 AM |
significant addition to section 25 of the faq | heat | Astronomy Misc | 1 | April 15th 04 01:20 AM |
The Apollo FAQ (moon landings were faked) | Nathan Jones | Misc | 8 | February 4th 04 06:48 PM |