![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I find it interesting that Sedna was discovered near its closest point in its
10,500 year orbit around the Sun. What are the chances of that happening? If you only consider the planet Sedna, the chances of discovering it while it is near is closest point to the Sun are very small. Sedna spends most of its time further away, this leads to the question how many other "Sedna's" are there? What if we looked for a 10th planet 1000 years ago with the same technology we have today? Would we find another Sedna-like planet nearing its closest point to the sun. Sedna will spend 150 closer to the Sun than from where we discovered it. statistically this leaves room for about 60 planets in 10,000 year orbits around the sun. all those planets are potential colonies for future colonists. The ones further away will be harder to find, but I'm sure we can eventually discover them. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
National Space Policy: NSDD-42 (issued on July 4th, 1982) | Stuf4 | Space Shuttle | 150 | July 28th 04 07:30 AM |
European high technology for the International Space Station | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | May 10th 04 02:40 PM |
Clueless pundits (was High-flight rate Medium vs. New Heavy lift launchers) | Rand Simberg | Space Science Misc | 18 | February 14th 04 03:28 AM |
Moon key to space future? | James White | Policy | 90 | January 6th 04 04:29 PM |
International Space Station Science - One of NASA's rising stars | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | December 27th 03 01:32 PM |