![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Henry Spencer wrote:
As did Bush, please note -- unless I've missed something, he hasn't said a word about it since. It's been suggested that he was hoping for a stronger and more positive public response, and when he didn't get it, the issue went very much on the back burner... which bodes ill for political support of exploration if he *is* re-elected. The other reason he would have made his announcement would have been to preempt criticism of how he's handled the space program. The Columbia loss occured on his watch, so he may have felt he needed to explain how he was going to address the underlying problems. It's convenient for him that large changes aren't until far in the future. Paul |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
National Space Policy: NSDD-42 (issued on July 4th, 1982) | Stuf4 | Space Shuttle | 150 | July 28th 04 07:30 AM |
European high technology for the International Space Station | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | May 10th 04 02:40 PM |
Clueless pundits (was High-flight rate Medium vs. New Heavy lift launchers) | Rand Simberg | Space Science Misc | 18 | February 14th 04 03:28 AM |
Moon key to space future? | James White | Policy | 90 | January 6th 04 04:29 PM |
International Space Station Science - One of NASA's rising stars | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | December 27th 03 01:32 PM |