Brad Guth's Credentials

Brad Guth wrote:
Robert Juliano; Umm... Brad?
you _DO_ realize that your last message sounded really crazy,
don't you?
(crazier than usual.)

Not really because, it's about par for my "crazier than usual"
lose-cannon method of pushing more of those do-not-push buttons.
BTW; if you're going to stalk and bash the likes of myself, in that
case please have yourself a go at others such as Geoffrey Landis.

In spite of the ongoing nasty Usenet and of NASA's gauntlets of
mainstream flak and naysayology, that which only goes towards further
proving that folks like myself are more than sufficiently right
(thereby doesn't mean that we're always right), whereas even "Geoffrey
A. Landis" holds out better than a gram worth of hope on behalf of
other life having existed and perhaps still coexisting as having
evolved on Venus. Whereas, at least technically and even biologically
speaking there's not an insurmountable problem, other than the ongoing
mainstream naysayism that's essentially running us amuck and smack into
a WW-III or bust situation.

Astrobiology: The Case for Venus by; Geoffrey A. Landis
http://gltrs.grc.nasa.gov/reports/20...003-212310.pdf

There most certainly are other qualified research teams and of their
scientist as having been accomplishing their thing, as to nailing down
another part of what's entirely possible. Meanwhile, the
observationology of what I've discovered as of more than 6 years ago is
still offering the same evidence as before, and to think that I haven't
10% the PhotoShop solutions nor hardly zero percent the resources as
per what our NIMA.MIL has to work with.

I can't but wonder what their true underlying problem actually is?
-
Brad Guth



Brad,

1.) Naysayology isn't a word, and fails to impress anyone.
2.) I am not "stalking and bashing you," I'm attempting to keep the net
clear of kooks and loons.
3.) observationology isn't a word, and fails to impress anyone. If you
want to impress someone, make sure to use actual words. In correct
sequences, with correct punctuation.

4.) perhaps the reason that NASA hasn't found your supposed venusian
civilization, is because it doesn't exist.

Bob