Teaching the white hole theory in galactic nucleus

The idea is the following: some sort of a gravitational disposition
generates
swirling conditions where matter avoids entering a central 'eye', a
white-hole-like object, thus refuting the Einsteinian concept that
on a sheet a ball sinks so deep that nothing can exit it, not even
light.
Matter swirls around this eye no differently on large scales than the
spiraling eye of the hurrican storm. Einstein's theory calculates that
due to the amount of mass in the nucleus of spiraling galaxies,
matter would collapse in a gravitational well so packed that
spacetime would collapse into a blackhole, from which nothing can
exit, not even light. So how come I am refuting this theory? What
possible explanation could unleash the black hole? What sort of
gravitational disposition could be accountable for demonstrating
different results than calculated? How could it be that there is
nothing
in a place where a black hole is expected, nothing, not even the
slightest curvature of spacetime, and a proposition of a view right
through the galactic nucleus and not the expected black spot.

So I am writing that the spiral galactic nucleus is a 'doughnut hole',
where if a star enters from above or below, it would wonder around
until splashing into the wall of the doughnut hole, and I quickly jump
in without explaining the underlying physics to suggest that a jet
is formed from such internal impacts. The central eye may be a
white hole for the Solar mass swirling around it, and as a white hole
it refuses matter swirling the eye to enter, and mysterious conditions
happen when matter moving inside collides with the wall.

As a white hole it would mean that perhaps no light is seen within
the eye, but crashing with such a wall from withing may reach the
gravitational threshold upon impact, and who knows what happens,
all we know is that active galaxies, especially ancient ones from
billions of years ago had a much higher activity in the central
galactic region, producing strong and very bright jets, possibly
from Suns dropping in from above and below this possible white hole,
right into the central region of the eye. What exactly would happen
based on this theory when there is an impact with a white hole wall
from within is a question if matter is quickly consumed or rejected,
but what astronomists primarily see in jets is that they are made of
electrons, thus if this theory is correct the Suns are consumed from
such conditions and energy outbursts produce electrons spiraling
out from this 'white hole', or otherwise refered to as jet-producing
quasars.

So where is the proof? And how did I arrive to the conclusion that
if a gravitational disposition exists generating an eye in the central
nucleus, then small blackholes could not hold their structural
integrity gravitationally as blackholes?

Tomorrow I may follow up with a proof for this theory.