When all the planets are explored in the solar system

In message , Midnighter
writes

"Wayne Throop" wrote in message
...
:: What does mars, or the moon, have that you can't get on earth easier?

: "
: Land. According to reputable authorities, it isn't being made around
: here any more. (Give or take sea reclamation projects. I think the
: Star Trek movie novelisation established they drained the
: Mediterranean.)
:
: However, it mostly can be bought more cheaply than a space rocket. And
: there isn't much terrific farming land elsewhere in the solar system.

Right; don't compare prices for land in manhattan, or even prime
farming land. Compare prices for land in the gobi desert, or antarctica,
or death valley, or subsea habs, or whatever.

The notion that you can obtain land by terraforming mars much more easily
than you can by terraforming the moon is fine... but it's much easier
to terraform earth.

One might say, "a second basket to put some of the species' eggs in".
But that's so long term, it's much like "we should stop burning fossil
fuels". Plus, what has the species done for me *lately*? Sure, yeah,
we should. But eh, shrug. (Mind you, the "eh, shrug" is not how *I*
feel about these issues; it's how they are going to be treated by most.)


the thing is, what happens when the earth and moon are used? for them to
drain the Med, that is pretty severe, even in the 24th century a la Picard
they were trying to raise a continent. Land was on a premium on earth in
star trek.

Was it? All the pictures we see show a green and pleasant land with a
remarkably high standard of living. I've never understood why a redshirt
would risk a very unpleasant end given Star Trek's social setting,
either.