![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Williams" wrote in message ... Wasn't it Chris.B who wrote: Wouldn't multiple dimensions require some rather strict cross-dimensional physical placement? The leakage from even a small black hole popping up on the dining table is apt to spoil ones appetite. Surely any cross-dimensional gravitational effects should be detectable? It depends how close the next universe is. If the nearest brane that contains matter happens to be the equivalent of a few tens of thousand light years away, then the gravity that leaks into our universe would be smeared out as if it were coming from diffuse invisible sources the size of a galaxy. What if the "other" branes containing matter/energy are exactly colocated with our universe, but "folded up" to sub-Planck lengths and hence undetectable. Matter/energy "here" corresponds exactly with matter/energy "there" and what we perceive and measure as our physical reality is in a way just the tip of the iceberg. The "distance" then is not physical... Too much wine and not enough maths perhaps..... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Young Galaxies Grow Up Together in a Nest of Dark Matter (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 23rd 05 04:30 PM |
Young Galaxies Grow Up Together in a Nest of Dark Matter (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | News | 0 | December 23rd 05 04:02 PM |
Can't get out of the universe "My crew will blow it up"!!!!!!!!!!! | zetasum | Space Shuttle | 0 | February 4th 05 11:11 PM |
Dark Matter and Dark Energy: One and the Same? | LenderBroker | Amateur Astronomy | 4 | July 14th 04 01:45 AM |