![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Part of a response (by Jan Owen) to one of my earlier post (1.25' v's
2" accessories) was: I have completely refurbished this scope over the years, adding top quality mirror cells, exquisite mirrors (primary by Mike Spooner, certified secondary by Antares). Is it common for experienced astronomers to change out their perfectly good "stock" mirrors with "after-market" mirrors strictly for higher performance? Jan states "top quality... exquisite mirrors." Are Spooner mirrors better than stock mirrors or just good substitutes when replacements are necessary; as was her situation? E.g. swapping a perfectly good Rochester Quadrajet carburetor with a Holly 750, or, a stock Fender pick-up with a Texas special... Just curious... Errol NOLA |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Robert Foot's mirror matter hypothesis relevant to dark accelerators? Murray 2003.03.30 | Rich Murray | Astronomy Misc | 1 | March 31st 05 10:50 AM |
Robert Foot's mirror matter hypothesis relevant to dark accelerators? Murray 2003.03.30 | Rich Murray | UK Astronomy | 1 | March 31st 05 10:50 AM |
Solar concentration mirrors in the outer solar system | wlm | Policy | 26 | September 13th 04 07:54 AM |
Questions on mirrors. | Gulliver | Astronomy Misc | 11 | March 10th 04 09:43 PM |
Temperature/cooling etc | Dr. Boggis | Amateur Astronomy | 26 | December 8th 03 02:59 PM |