![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Link courtesy of http://www.nasawatch.com
The part that I found most interesting is the debate about whether everything should go into the exploration program or should some funds be used for a wider ranging program. This is not a new discussion, as we can see by looking back 44 years: http://klabs.org/history/monographs/no_37/appendix2.htm Happy New Year! -- rk -------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/31/opinion/31sat1.html NASA's Predicament Published: December 31, 2005 NASA is headed into the next year with ambitious goals and no assurance that it will get the money needed to carry them out. With large deficits looming in the space shuttle accounts, there is some danger that the space agency could work itself into a familiar corner by trying to do too much with too little, a sure-fire recipe for disaster. -- end excerpt -- -- rk, Just an OldEngineer "The number of people having any connection with the project must be restricted in an almost vicious manner. Use a small number of good people." -- Kelly Johnson in Skunk Works |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NYT Editorial: NASA's Predicament | rk | Space Shuttle | 45 | January 13th 06 01:23 AM |
NASA's Phoenix Mars Mission Gets Thumbs up for 2007 Launch | Sam Wormley | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | June 3rd 05 04:50 AM |
NASA's Finances in Disarray; $565 Billion in Adjustments | Don Corleone | Space Shuttle | 8 | May 18th 04 03:19 PM |
NASA's year of sorrow, recovery, progress and success | Jacques van Oene | Space Shuttle | 0 | December 31st 03 07:28 PM |
NASA's year of sorrow, recovery, progress and success | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | December 31st 03 07:28 PM |