![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Found at:
http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/20...-ditched_x.htm Hubble Space Telescope first casualty of Bush space initiative By Paul Recer, The Associated Press WASHINGTON — The Hubble Space Telescope will be allowed to degrade and eventually become useless as NASA changes focus to President Bush's plans to send humans to the moon, Mars and beyond, officials say. NASA canceled all space shuttle servicing missions to the Hubble, which has revolutionized the study of astronomy with its striking images of the universe. John Grunsfeld, NASA's chief scientist, said Friday that NASA administrator Sean O'Keefe made the decision to cancel the fifth space shuttle service mission to the Hubble when it became clear there was not enough time to conduct it before the shuttle is retired. The servicing mission was considered essential to enable the orbiting telescope to continue to operate. "This is a sad day," said Grunsfeld, but he said the decision "is the best thing for the space community." He said the decision was influenced by President Bush's new space initiative, which calls for NASA to start developing the spacecraft and equipment for voyages to the moon and later to Mars. The president's plan also called for the space shuttle to be retired by 2010. Virtually all of the shuttle's remaining flights would be used to complete construction of the International Space Station. The shuttle has been grounded since the explosion of the Columbia nearly a year ago. end excerpt It is ridiculous to blame the Hubble decision on President Bush's new Moon/Mars space initiative. This decision was made because of the Columbia space shuttle disaster; the safety concerns related to future shuttle launches; the *very* large number of shuttle launches required to finish the International space station; and the fact that the Columbia disaster has severly damaged the space station construction schedule due to the grounding of the other shuttles. All of these problems would still exist even if President Bush had not announced a new space initiative, and the decision about Hubble would be the same. I personally hope NASA can figure out a way to service the Hubble telescope. It is more important than any one piece of the International space station, so if one flight has to be cancelled, let it be one to the International space station rather than the one to Hubble, especially considering that we already have $200 million worth of new instruments to add to Hubble that have already been bought and paid for. TA |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
National Space Policy: NSDD-42 (issued on July 4th, 1982) | Stuf4 | Space Shuttle | 150 | July 28th 04 07:30 AM |
European high technology for the International Space Station | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | May 10th 04 02:40 PM |
UA Scientist Sheds New Lights On Outer Planets With Hubble Space Telescope | Ron | Science | 3 | January 26th 04 01:38 PM |
Moon key to space future? | James White | Policy | 90 | January 6th 04 04:29 PM |
New Hubble Space Telescope Exhibit Opens At Goddard | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | September 30th 03 11:07 PM |