![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was reading Greg Crinklaws cool observing essay:
http://www.skyhound.com/sh/Focus/Mars/Hall.html In there Greg quotes The Telescope Handbook and Star Atlas by Neale E. Howard as follows: "Certainly the strangest little objects in the whole solar system, the two moons of Mars will rarely be seen by the amateur unless he possesses a 16-inch telescope, and then only at favorable oppositions." The rest of the essay and the general feel I get from reading miscellaneous sites is that it's not very common to see these two little moons. I observe from about an hour north of Anchorage Alaska, seeing is usually mediocre, cold and fogging problems are common. Mars peaks about 45 degrees elevation here. I had no plans to even go after the moons of Mars, until the other night (Nov-1) watching Sinus Sabaeus transit the planet when Deimos decided to come after me. I was using a TMB 7" refractor with an AP binoviewer and two 6mm TMB supermonocentrics for 396x. Seeing was 5/10 with rare moments when detail would seemingly crystalize over the entire planet disc. (Maybe 2 or 3 times during a couple hours.) I think it was good luck that led me to Deimos. I've heard there are specific directions from your center of vision where averted vision is the strongest. As I would watch the western end of Sinus Sabaeus, I kept noticing an interloper popping in and out of existence what seemed a couple mars-widths off the planet to the East. It was obviously right in a peripheral hot spot in my eye because it would disappear any time I looked at it. I had a suspicion as to what I was seeing! I ran into the house, and messed around with Skytools and confirmed it was Deimos. The house is about 65 degrees F warmer than my observing chair, so I took my time. About 1/2 hour later i went out and it took me about another 15 minutes to re-aquire the moon, Deimos had moved relative to an imaginary line drawn across Mars equator. These moons must be really racking up the mileage fast. I tried shifting Mars out of view and Deimos became quite obvious with averted vision. Still, I could not lock onto the moon with direct vision in this fashion. Now Phobos is what, like 3 times brighter? But I havent managed to see it yet. The Deimos experience has me checking each night to see what times Phobos and Deimos will be at their greatest ?elongation? I have a feeling dimmer Deimos is the easier of the two. It seemed easy to spot once I aquired it. Seeing conditions have not allowed me to see it since. I made a sketch the following day http://www.scopenews.com/tmb175/mars..._deimos_sm.jpg 175mm is a lot smaller then 16 inches. I'm guessing tools like the binoviewer and supermonocentric eyepieces are my trump card over Neale E. Howard. Deimos looked obvious enough that I am sure I could have seen it in a smaller aperture than I was using. Mike Clemens |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Space Calendar - April 30, 2004 | Ron | History | 0 | April 30th 04 03:55 PM |
Space Calendar - November 26, 2003 | Ron Baalke | Misc | 1 | November 28th 03 09:21 AM |
Space Calendar - October 24, 2003 | Ron Baalke | History | 0 | October 24th 03 04:38 PM |
Space Calendar - September 28, 2003 | Ron Baalke | History | 0 | September 28th 03 08:00 AM |
Space Calendar - August 28, 2003 | Ron Baalke | History | 0 | August 28th 03 05:32 PM |