![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Since a major point of the shuttle was to construct a
space station why didn't construction start with like the third or fourth shuttle launch in the 1980s? Why didn't more people question the absence of any serious station plan then? I recall seeing lots of newspaper articles in the late 1970s depicting how the fancy new space station might look and there was a lot of talk about that sort of thing but it all faded away sometime BEFORE the first shuttle launch replaced with an emphasis on flying habit modules and labs in the shuttle cargo bay. Or am I remembering wrong? -McDaniel |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is NASAs shuttle replacement obsolete before being even built? | bob haller | Space Shuttle | 18 | June 23rd 04 08:01 AM |
Congress hearing on ending shuttle sooner | bob haller | Space Shuttle | 1 | March 30th 04 08:37 PM |
Space elevator will be built around 2015 | Steen Eiler Jørgensen | Policy | 97 | October 13th 03 04:51 PM |